Constituency | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |
No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
% of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% |
Total valid votes in \(A = 5,00,000\)
Minimum no of valid votes required to save the security deposits = \(\frac{1}{6}×500000 = 83334\)
As per \(1^{st}\) additional information ⇒ the gap between \(1^{st}\) and \(2^{nd}\) runners up is \(10,000\)
So the table for \(A⇒ total ⇒ 5,00,000\)
Winner \(→ 275000\)
\(1^{st}\) runner up \(→ 55000\)
\(2^{nd}\) runner up \(→ 85000\)
Total \(→ 455000\)
The valid votes got by the other \(7\) candidates = \(5,00,000 - 4,55,000\)
= \(45000\)
\(∴\) the % of votes by the candidates who lost the security deposit is = \(\frac{45000}{500000}×100 = 9\%\)
Total Valid Votes:
Minimum Votes to Save Security Deposit:
Votes Distribution:
Remaining Votes:
Candidates Losing Security Deposit:
Percentage Calculation:
So, the correct answer for constituency A is:
Information:
Vote Distribution:
Here's a summary table based on the information provided:
Constituency | Total Votes | Winner Votes | 1st Runner-Up Votes | 2nd Runner-Up Votes | 3rd Runner-Up Votes | 4th Runner-Up Votes | 5th Highest Votes | Total of Top 5 Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 500,000 | 275,000 | 95,000 | 85,000 | - | - | - | 455,000 |
C | 600,030 | 140,006 | 130,006 | 120,006 | 110,006 | 100,006 | >100,006 | 600,030 |
D | 100x | 15x+37,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Conclusion:
This table provides a clear and simple overview of the vote distribution and calculations for each constituency based on the given information.
So the correct answer is option (B): 9%
Total valid votes in \(A=3,25,000\)
Minimum no of valid votes required to save the security deposits = \(\frac{1}{6}×325,000 = 54167\)
We can see the winner himself/herself has got \(48,750\) no of votes which is less than \(\frac{1}{6}\)th of the total votes.
\(∴\) all of the candidates got less than \(\frac{1}{6}\)th of the valid votes.
\(∴\) security deposits will be forfeited for all of the candidates as winner is exempted from this condition. (total no of such candidates = \(12-1 = 11\)).
Total Valid Votes:
Minimum Votes to Save Security Deposit:
Votes Distribution:
Remaining Votes:
Candidates Losing Security Deposit:
Percentage Calculation:
So, the correct answer for constituency A is:
Information:
Vote Distribution:
Here's a summary table based on the information provided:
Constituency | Total Votes | Winner Votes | 1st Runner-Up Votes | 2nd Runner-Up Votes | 3rd Runner-Up Votes | 4th Runner-Up Votes | 5th Highest Votes | Total of Top 5 Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 500,000 | 275,000 | 95,000 | 85,000 | - | - | - | 455,000 |
C | 600,030 | 140,006 | 130,006 | 120,006 | 110,006 | 100,006 | >100,006 | 600,030 |
D | 100x | 15x+37,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Conclusion:
In constituency B, the threshold for keeping the security deposit is 16×325,00061×325,000, which equals 54,167 votes. However, since the winner received fewer than 54,167 votes, it means all the other candidates also lost their security deposits. Therefore, the correct answer is that 11 candidates lost their security deposits.
The correct answer is (A): \(1,40,006\)
As the additional information in condition (2)
The minimum difference in no of votes between any pair of candidates = \(10,000\)
As there are \(5\) candidates in c, the possible distribution of valid is as follows.
Candidates | \(C_1\) | \(C_2\) | \(C_3\) | \(C_4\) | \(C_5\) | \(Total\) |
1,40,000 | 1,30,000 | 1,20,000 | 1,10,000 | 1,00,000 | 6,00,000 |
Additional \(30\) votes can be distributed among them to maintain the gap at least \(10,000\).
So the possible answer is \(1,40,006\).
Total Valid Votes:
Minimum Votes to Save Security Deposit:
Votes Distribution:
Remaining Votes:
Candidates Losing Security Deposit:
Percentage Calculation:
So, the correct answer for constituency A is:
Information:
Vote Distribution:
Here's a summary table based on the information provided:
Constituency | Total Votes | Winner Votes | 1st Runner-Up Votes | 2nd Runner-Up Votes | 3rd Runner-Up Votes | 4th Runner-Up Votes | 5th Highest Votes | Total of Top 5 Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 500,000 | 275,000 | 95,000 | 85,000 | - | - | - | 455,000 |
C | 600,030 | 140,006 | 130,006 | 120,006 | 110,006 | 100,006 | >100,006 | 600,030 |
D | 100x | 15x+37,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Number of votes polled to winning candidate must be 140006.
The correct answer is (A): \(1,75,000\)
Let the no of valid votes = \(100x\)
The table looks like the following:
Total votes → \(100x\)
Winner → \(39375\)
\(1^{st}\) → \(37,500\)
\(2^{nd}\) → \(30,000\)
\(3^{rd}\) → \(10x\)
Total → \(1,06,875\)
As the winner got \(51\) more than \(1^{st}\) runner up (as per \(3\))
Total no of votes has to be more than
= \(\frac{39375 + 37,500 + 30,000}{0.9}\)
= \(1,10,208\)
∴ option \((62,500)\) is ruled out.
To eliminate two more options, lets consider \(1,50,000\) to be the correct one [as one option is less than the other one is the greater than this option]
\(∴ 100x = 1,50,000\)
Total → \(1,50,000\)
Winner → \(45,000\)
\(1^{st}\) → \(37500\)
\(2^{nd}\) → \(30,000\)
\(3^{rd}\) → \(15,000\)
Total → \(1,06,875\)
Minimum rates to save security deposits = \(\frac{1}{6}×150000 = 25000\)
So we can see except 3 candidates all others have lost their security deposits.
Candidates who saved their security deposits = \((100-35)\% = 65\%\) [ as per \(3^{rd}\) additional inform]
\(∴ 65\% \;of\; 150000 = 97500\)
→ which is less than \(1,12,500\)
\(∴\) answer will be more than \(1,50,000\)
Total Valid Votes:
Minimum Votes to Save Security Deposit:
Votes Distribution:
Remaining Votes:
Candidates Losing Security Deposit:
Percentage Calculation:
So, the correct answer for constituency A is:
Information:
Vote Distribution:
Here's a summary table based on the information provided:
Constituency | Total Votes | Winner Votes | 1st Runner-Up Votes | 2nd Runner-Up Votes | 3rd Runner-Up Votes | 4th Runner-Up Votes | 5th Highest Votes | Total of Top 5 Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 500,000 | 275,000 | 95,000 | 85,000 | - | - | - | 455,000 |
C | 600,030 | 140,006 | 130,006 | 120,006 | 110,006 | 100,006 | >100,006 | 600,030 |
D | 100x | 15x+37,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
In constituency B, the requirement for not losing the security deposit is to get at least 16.67% of the votes. Therefore, the third runner-up certainly did not keep their deposit.
Candidates who kept their security deposit collectively received 65% of the votes.
Case 1:
If the top three candidates kept their security deposit, then the vote distribution is:
Case 2:
If the top two candidates kept their security deposit, then the vote distribution is:
Since the correct allocation of votes does not align with the increasing order of A and D, which should follow the condition but does not in the first option, the first option is the correct answer.
The correct answer is (C): B,C,D,A
Margins
A → \(2,75,000 - 95000 = 180000\)
B →
C → \(1,50,000 - 1, 40,000 = 10,000\)
D → \(39,375 - 37,500 = 1,875\)
Clearly the margin in C is more than that of D.
So clearly the sequence B , C , D , A is not possible.
Total Valid Votes:
Minimum Votes to Save Security Deposit:
Votes Distribution:
Remaining Votes:
Candidates Losing Security Deposit:
Percentage Calculation:
So, the correct answer for constituency A is:
Information:
Vote Distribution:
Here's a summary table based on the information provided:
Constituency | Total Votes | Winner Votes | 1st Runner-Up Votes | 2nd Runner-Up Votes | 3rd Runner-Up Votes | 4th Runner-Up Votes | 5th Highest Votes | Total of Top 5 Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 500,000 | 275,000 | 95,000 | 85,000 | - | - | - | 455,000 |
C | 600,030 | 140,006 | 130,006 | 120,006 | 110,006 | 100,006 | >100,006 | 600,030 |
D | 100x | 15x+37,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
As calculated previously, candidate D received 175,000 votes. The winner received 5% more votes than the first runner-up, which means the winner got 8,750 more votes than the first runner-up (5% of 175,000 = 8,750). Thus, the winning margin in constituency D is 8,750 votes.
Additionally, the margin in constituency C is at least 10,000 votes.
Therefore, in the increasing order of winning margins, C should always come after D. Since this order is not followed in the third option, the third option is the correct answer.
The correct answer is (A): \(23.91\%\)
The no. of votes got by the candidates who has lost their security deposits is as follows
In \(A →\) \(45000\)
In \(B → 325000 - 48750 = 276250\)
In \(C → 0\)
In \(D → 175000 - 46250 - 37500 - 30000 = 61250\)
\(Req\% = \frac{382500}{500000+325000+600000+175000}×100\)
= \(\frac{382500}{1600000}×100 = 23.91\%\)
Total Valid Votes:
Minimum Votes to Save Security Deposit:
Votes Distribution:
Remaining Votes:
Candidates Losing Security Deposit:
Percentage Calculation:
So, the correct answer for constituency A is:
Information:
Vote Distribution:
Here's a summary table based on the information provided:
Constituency | Total Votes | Winner Votes | 1st Runner-Up Votes | 2nd Runner-Up Votes | 3rd Runner-Up Votes | 4th Runner-Up Votes | 5th Highest Votes | Total of Top 5 Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 500,000 | 275,000 | 95,000 | 85,000 | - | - | - | 455,000 |
C | 600,030 | 140,006 | 130,006 | 120,006 | 110,006 | 100,006 | >100,006 | 600,030 |
D | 100x | 15x+37,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Understanding the Security Deposit Condition:
Case Analysis for Security Deposits:
Case 1:
37,500+5𝑥+37,500+30,000=65𝑥37,500+5x+37,500+30,000=65x
105,000=65𝑥105,000=65x
𝑥=1,750x=1,750
100𝑥=175,000100x=175,000
Case 2:
37,500+5𝑥+37,500=65𝑥37,500+5x+37,500=65x
75,000=60𝑥75,000=60x
𝑥=1,250x=1,250
Constituency A: Total votes = 500,000
Constituency B: Total votes = 325,000
Constituency C: Total votes = 600,030
Constituency D: Total votes = 175,000
Total votes losing deposit: 45,000 (A) + 276,250 (B) + 0 (C) + 98,750 (D) = 420,000
Total votes across all constituencies: 500,000 (A) + 325,000 (B) + 600,030 (C) + 175,000 (D) = 1,600,030
Percentage of votes losing deposit:
420,0001,600,030×100=26.25%1,600,030420,000×100=26.25%
So, the percentage of votes polled by candidates who lost their security deposit across all constituencies is approximately 26.25%.
Firm | First year of existence | Last year of existence | Total amount raised (Rs. crores) |
---|---|---|---|
Alfloo | 2009 | 2016 | 21 |
Bzygoo | 2012 | 2015 | |
Czechy | 2013 | 9 | |
Drjbna | 2011 | 2015 | 10 |
Elavalaki | 2010 | 13 |
Table 1: 2-day averages for Days through 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 |
15 | 15.5 | 16 | 17 |
Table 2 : Ranks of participants on each day | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | |
Akhil | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Bimal | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Chatur | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |