We are given a diffraction experiment where the slit is illuminated by light of wavelength \( \lambda = 600 \, \text{nm} \) (which is \( 600 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{m} \)), and the first minimum of the diffraction pattern occurs at an angle \( \theta = 30^\circ \). We are tasked with calculating the width of the slit.
- In a single-slit diffraction pattern, the angular positions of the minima are given by the condition:
\[ a \sin(\theta) = m\lambda \]
where: - \( a \) is the width of the slit, - \( \theta \) is the angle of diffraction, - \( m \) is the order of the minima (for the first minimum, \( m = 1 \)), - \( \lambda \) is the wavelength of the light.
For the first minimum, \( m = 1 \), and the given angle is \( \theta = 30^\circ \). The formula becomes:
\[ a \sin(30^\circ) = \lambda \]
We know that \( \sin(30^\circ) = \frac{1}{2} \), so the equation becomes:
\[ a \times \frac{1}{2} = 600 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{m} \]
Multiplying both sides by 2 to solve for \( a \):
\[ a = 2 \times 600 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{m} = 1200 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{m} = 1.2 \times 10^{-6} \, \text{m} \]
The width of the slit is \( \boxed{1.2 \, \mu\text{m}} \).
Alexia Limited invited applications for issuing 1,00,000 equity shares of ₹ 10 each at premium of ₹ 10 per share.
The amount was payable as follows:
Applications were received for 1,50,000 equity shares and allotment was made to the applicants as follows:
Category A: Applicants for 90,000 shares were allotted 70,000 shares.
Category B: Applicants for 60,000 shares were allotted 30,000 shares.
Excess money received on application was adjusted towards allotment and first and final call.
Shekhar, who had applied for 1200 shares failed to pay the first and final call. Shekhar belonged to category B.
Pass necessary journal entries for the above transactions in the books of Alexia Limited. Open calls in arrears and calls in advance account, wherever necessary.
