Given: \[ (\sqrt{2})^{19} \cdot 3^4 \cdot 4^2 \cdot 9^m \cdot 8^n = 3^n \cdot 16^m \cdot \sqrt[4]{64} \]
Substitute back into the equation: \[ 2^{19/2} \cdot 2^4 \cdot 2^{3n} \cdot 3^4 \cdot 3^{2m} = 2^{4m} \cdot 2^{3/2} \cdot 3^n \]
Left side: \[ 2^{19/2 + 4 + 3n} \cdot 3^{4 + 2m} \] Right side: \[ 2^{4m + 3/2} \cdot 3^n \]
From base 3: \[ n = 4 + 2m \quad \text{(i)} \] Substitute into base 2 equation: \[ \frac{19}{2} + 4 + 3(4 + 2m) = 4m + \frac{3}{2} \] \[ \frac{27}{2} + 12 + 6m = 4m + \frac{3}{2} \] \[ \frac{51}{2} + 6m = 4m + \frac{3}{2} \] Multiply both sides by 2: \[ 51 + 12m = 8m + 3 \Rightarrow 4m = -48 \Rightarrow m = -12 \]
\[ \boxed{m = -12} \]
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)