Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a problem about averages, specifically the combination of two groups. The final average of the combined group is a weighted average of the individual group averages. We can set up an equation relating the sum of ages before and after the new students join. Alternatively, this can be solved efficiently using the method of alligation.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Method 1: Using the definition of average
Let \(n_1\) be the initial number of students and \(n_2\) be the number of new students.
Initial sum of ages = \(n_1 \times 18\).
Sum of ages of new students = \(n_2 \times 16\).
Final total number of students = \(n_1 + n_2\).
Final sum of ages = \(18n_1 + 16n_2\).
Final average age = \(\frac{18n_1 + 16n_2}{n_1 + n_2} = 17\).
We need to solve this equation for the ratio \(n_2 : n_1\).
Method 2: Alligation
Alligation is a rule that enables us to find the ratio in which two or more ingredients at the given prices must be mixed to produce a mixture of a desired price. Here, we use 'age' instead of 'price'.
We set up a diagram:
| Age of Group 1 | Age of Group 2 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| \(\searrow\) \(\swarrow\) | ||
| Mean Age (17) | ||
| \(\nearrow\) \(\nwarrow\) | ||
| (17 - 16) | (18 - 17) | |
| 1 | 1 |
The ratio of the quantities (number of students) is the inverse of the ratio of the differences.
Ratio \(n_1 : n_2\) = \((17-16) : (18-17)\).
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Using Method 1 (Algebraic Equation):
\(\frac{18n_1 + 16n_2}{n_1 + n_2} = 17\)
Multiply both sides by \((n_1 + n_2)\):
\(18n_1 + 16n_2 = 17(n_1 + n_2)\)
\(18n_1 + 16n_2 = 17n_1 + 17n_2\)
Now, group the terms with \(n_1\) on one side and the terms with \(n_2\) on the other.
\(18n_1 - 17n_1 = 17n_2 - 16n_2\)
\(n_1 = n_2\)
This means the number of initial students is equal to the number of new students.
The ratio of the number of students who joined (\(n_2\)) to the number of students who were initially in the class (\(n_1\)) is:
\(\frac{n_2}{n_1} = \frac{n_1}{n_1} = \frac{1}{1}\)
So, the ratio is 1:1.
Using Method 2 (Alligation):
The difference between the initial average age (18) and the final average age (17) is \(18-17=1\).
The difference between the new students' average age (16) and the final average age (17) is \(17-16=1\).
The rule of alligation states that the ratio of the number of initial students (\(n_1\)) to the number of new students (\(n_2\)) is the inverse of the ratio of these differences.
\(\frac{n_1}{n_2} = \frac{17 - 16}{18 - 17} = \frac{1}{1}\)
This gives \(n_1 : n_2 = 1:1\).
The question asks for the ratio of the number of students who joined (\(n_2\)) to the number of students who were initially in the class (\(n_1\)), which is also \(n_2 : n_1 = 1:1\).
Step 4: Final Answer:
The required ratio is 1:1.
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)