Step 1: Determine the dimensions of matrices A and B.
Matrix A has 3 rows and 3 columns, so its dimension is \(3 \times 3\).
Matrix B has 3 rows and 2 columns, so its dimension is \(3 \times 2\).
Step 2: Check the condition for each operation.
(A) For the product AB to be defined, the number of columns in A must be equal to the number of rows in B. Here, A has 3 columns and B has 3 rows, so AB is defined. The resulting matrix will have dimensions \(3 \times 2\). The statement is correct.
(B) For the product BA to be defined, the number of columns in B (2) must be equal to the number of rows in A (3). Since \(2 \neq 3\), BA is not defined. The statement is correct.
(C) For matrix addition A + B to be defined, the matrices must have the same dimensions. A is \(3 \times 3\) and B is \(3 \times 2\). Since their dimensions are different, A + B is not defined. The statement is correct.
(D) For matrix subtraction A - B to be defined, the matrices must have the same dimensions. Since A is \(3 \times 3\) and B is \(3 \times 2\), A - B is not defined. The statement says that A - B is defined, which is incorrect.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |