Step 1: Gauss’s Law Statement
According to Gauss’s Law: \[ \oint \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{A} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\epsilon_0} \] where: - \( \oint \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{A} \) = Total electric flux, - \( Q_{\text{enc}} \) = Enclosed charge,
- \( \epsilon_0 \) = Permittivity of free space.
Step 2: Choosing a Gaussian Surface
- Consider an infinite charged plane with surface charge density \( \sigma \).
- The charge is uniformly distributed over the plane.
- We use a Gaussian cylinder (pillbox) that extends equally on both sides of the plane.
Step 3: Applying Gauss’s Law
- The flux is perpendicular to the surface.
- The total flux through the two flat surfaces of the pillbox is: \[ \oint \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{A} = E A + E A = 2E A \] - The enclosed charge is: \[ Q_{\text{enc}} = \sigma A \] - Applying Gauss's Law: \[ 2E A = \frac{\sigma A}{\epsilon_0} \] \[ E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \] Thus, the electric field due to an infinite plane sheet is: \[ E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \]
Simar, Tanvi, and Umara were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 5 : 6 : 9. On 31st March, 2024, their Balance Sheet was as follows:
Liabilities | Amount (₹) | Assets | Amount (₹) |
Capitals: | Fixed Assets | 25,00,000 | |
Simar | 13,00,000 | Stock | 10,00,000 |
Tanvi | 12,00,000 | Debtors | 8,00,000 |
Umara | 14,00,000 | Cash | 7,00,000 |
General Reserve | 7,00,000 | Profit and Loss A/c | 2,00,000 |
Trade Payables | 6,00,000 | ||
Total | 52,00,000 | Total | 52,00,000 |
Umara died on 30th June, 2024. The partnership deed provided for the following on the death of a partner:
If \(\begin{vmatrix} 2x & 3 \\ x & -8 \\ \end{vmatrix} = 0\), then the value of \(x\) is: