Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks about the historical value and significance of the surveys conducted by Francis Buchanan in early colonial India.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The accounts and surveys conducted by Francis Buchanan (an official of the British East India Company in the early 19th century) are immensely valuable to historians for several reasons:
\begin{itemize}[noitemsep]
\item Detailed Primary Source: Buchanan's surveys provide one of the most detailed and systematic accounts of the conditions in various parts of India (like Bengal, Bihar, and Mysore) during the early colonial period.
\item Comprehensive Information: His reports were encyclopedic in nature. They contained information on topography, soil, minerals, agriculture, industries, trade, social customs, castes, religious practices, and local histories.
\item Snapshot of a Society in Transition: His work captures a picture of Indian society just as British influence was becoming dominant, providing a crucial baseline for historians to study the changes that occurred under colonial rule.
\item Economic History: Historians use his statistical data to study topics like de-industrialization and the state of the rural economy before the full impact of British policies was felt.
\end{itemize}
Critical Perspective: While invaluable, historians also use his accounts with caution. Buchanan wrote from a colonial perspective, and his surveys were often intended to identify resources that the East India Company could exploit. His understanding and descriptions of Indian society were shaped by his colonial mindset.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Buchanan's accounts are extremely valuable as a detailed primary source providing comprehensive information on the economy, society, and culture of early 19th-century India, though they must be interpreted critically due to their colonial perspective.
”The British element is gone, but they have left the mischief behind”
It is no use saying that we ask for separate electorates, because it is good for us. We have heard it long enough. We have heard it for years, and as a result of this agitation we are now a separate nation ... Can you show me one free country where there are separate electorates? If so, I shall be prepared to accept it. But in this unfortunate country if this separate electorate is going to be persisted in, even after the division of the country, woe betide the country; it is not worth living in. Therefore, I say, it is not for my good alone, it is for your own good that I say it, forget the past. One day, we may be united ... The British element is gone, but they have left the mischief behind. We do not want to perpetuate that mischief. (Hear, hear). When the British introduced this element they had not expected that they will have to go so soon. They wanted it for their easy administration. That is all right. But they have left the legacy behind. Are we to get out of it or not?
Charkha
What I object to, is the craze for machinery as such. The craze is for what they call labour-saving machinery. Men go on ”saving labour”, till thousands are without work and thrown on the open streets to die of starvation. I want to save time and labour, not for a fraction of mankind, but for all; I want the concentration of wealth, not in the hands of few, but in the hands of all. YOUNG INDIA, 13 NOVEMBER 1924 Khaddar does not seek to destroy all machinery but it does regulate its use and check its weedy growth. It uses machinery for the service of the poorest in their own cottages. The wheel is itself an exquisite piece of machinery. YOUNG INDIA, 17 MARCH 1927
Match List-I with List-II:
| List-I (Leaders) | List-II (Regions) |
|---|---|
| (A) Shah Mal | (I) Pargana Barout in Uttar Pradesh |
| (B) Gonoo | (II) Singhbhum in Chotanagpur |
| (C) Birjis Qadr | (III) Awadh |
| (D) Kunwar Singh | (IV) Arrah in Bihar |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: