The correct answer is (B):
Let the original two-digit number be \( ab \), where \( a \) is the tens digit and \( b \neq 0 \) is the units digit.
The value of the number is \( 10a + b \). After interchanging the digits, the new number becomes \( ba = 10b + a \).
Given condition: \[ 10a + b > 3(10b + a) \]
Expand the inequality: \[ 10a + b > 30b + 3a \] \[ 10a - 3a > 30b - b \Rightarrow 7a > 29b \]
Now we test integer values of \( b \) from 1 to 9 (since \( b \neq 0 \)), and find integer values of \( a \) from 1 to 9 that satisfy the inequality.
Hence, total valid combinations = \( 5 + 1 = \boxed{6} \)
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)