We are given the equation:
\[ m^2 + 105 = n^2 \Rightarrow n^2 - m^2 = 105 \Rightarrow (n - m)(n + m) = 105 \]
This means we must find the number of ways to express 105 as a product of two positive integers \( (n - m)(n + m) \), where \( n > m \).
\[ 105 = 3 \times 5 \times 7 \]
So, the number of positive divisors of 105 is: \[ (1+1)(1+1)(1+1) = 8 \]
Each pair of factors \((a, b)\) such that \( a \cdot b = 105 \) and \( a < b \), gives a unique solution.
Hence, number of such pairs: \[ \frac{8}{2} = 4 \]
There are exactly 4 integer pairs (m, n) satisfying the equation \( m^2 + 105 = n^2 \).
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)