Step 1: Identify the tense and voice of the sentence. The sentence is in the past tense ("did not manage"), so the blank should also be in the past tense.
Step 2: Understand the structure. The phrase "he got it fixed" is the correct causative form in English, meaning "he arranged for someone else to fix it."
Step 3: Eliminate wrong options.
- (B) "getting it fixed" → present participle, grammatically incorrect in this past tense structure.
- (C) "gets fixed" → simple present, does not match past context.
- (D) "got fixed" → incorrect because "he got fixed" changes meaning (implies he was repaired himself).
\[
\boxed{\text{The correct answer is (A) got it fixed.}}
\]
Is there any good show __________ television tonight? Select the most appropriate option to complete the above sentence.
Identify the option that has the most appropriate sequence such that a coherent paragraph is formed:
Statement:
P. At once, without thinking much, people rushed towards the city in hordes with the sole aim of grabbing as much gold as they could.
Q. However, little did they realize about the impending hardships they would have to face on their way to the city: miles of mud, unfriendly forests, hungry beasts, and inimical local lords—all of which would reduce their chances of getting gold to almost zero.
R. All of them thought that easily they could lay their hands on gold and become wealthy overnight.
S. About a hundred years ago, the news that gold had been discovered in Kolar spread like wildfire and the whole State was in raptures.
Fish : Shoal :: Lion : _________
Select the correct option to complete the analogy.
P and Q play chess frequently against each other. Of these matches, P has won 80% of the matches, drawn 15% of the matches, and lost 5% of the matches.
If they play 3 more matches, what is the probability of P winning exactly 2 of these 3 matches?