The Salt March (Dandi March) in 1930, led by Mahatma Gandhi, was a key event in the Indian freedom struggle. Gandhiji used the British-imposed Salt Tax as a tool to mobilize mass discontent across all sections of Indian society against British colonial rule.
1. The Salt Tax as an Unpopular Measure:
The British government imposed a monopoly on the production and sale of salt in India, which was a basic necessity for all Indians. This Salt Tax was seen as particularly exploitative, as it affected every citizen, regardless of their social or economic status. Gandhiji recognized that the Salt Tax was an ideal issue to rally the masses because of its universal appeal.
2. The Dandi March:
In March 1930, Gandhiji embarked on the historic 240-mile Salt March from Sabarmati Ashram to the coastal village of Dandi. This was a direct act of civil disobedience against the Salt Laws, as he and his followers made salt from seawater, defying the British monopoly. The act of making salt was simple but symbolically powerful, sending a message of resistance to British control.
3. Mass Mobilization Across India:
The Salt March was not just an isolated protest; it inspired thousands of Indians from all walks of life to join the civil disobedience movement. As the marchers reached Dandi and produced salt, news of the protest spread rapidly, and many others across India started making salt in defiance of British laws. This movement brought together people of different communities, regions, and economic backgrounds, making it a significant nationwide event.
4. International Attention:
The Salt March gained immense international attention. It showcased the non-violent approach of the Indian independence movement and exposed the British exploitation of India's resources. The act of defiance against an unjust law helped galvanize global support for India’s independence movement.
5. Catalyst for Wider Resistance:
The Salt March was a catalyst for a wider resistance against British rule. It led to the mass arrest of thousands of Indians, including many leaders, and became a symbol of the Indian struggle for freedom. The campaign inspired other movements and protests across the country, eventually leading to the Quit India Movement of 1942.
The Anguish of the King
When the king Devanampiya Piyadassi had been ruling for eight years, the (country of the) Kalingas (present-day coastal Orissa) was conquered by (him). One hundred and fifty thousand men were deported, a hundred thousand were killed, and many more died.
After that, now that (the country of) the Kalingas has been taken, Devanampiya (is devoted) to an intense study of Dhamma, to the love of Dhamma, and to instructing (the people) in Dhamma.
This is the repentance of Devanampiya on account of his conquest of the (country of the) Kalingas.
For this is considered very painful and deplorable by Devanampiya that, while one is conquering an unconquered (country) slaughter, death and deportation of people (take place) there...
Declining a Royal Gift
This excerpt from a sufi text describes the proceedings at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s hospice in 1313 : I (the author, Amir Hasan Sijzi) had the good fortune of kissing his (Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s) feet ... At this time a local ruler had sent him the deed of ownership to two gardens and much land, along with the provisions and tools for their maintenance. The ruler had also made it clear that he was relinquishing all his rights to both the gardens and land. The master ... had not accepted that gift. Instead, he had lamented: “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands ? ... None of our ... spiritual masters had engaged in such activity.”
Then he told an appropriate story: “... Sultan Ghiyasuddin, who at that time was still known as Ulugh Khan, came to visit Shaikh Fariduddin (and) offered some money and ownership deeds for four villages to the Shaikh, the money being for the benefit of the dervishes (sufis), and the land for his use. Smiling, Shaikh al Islam (Fariduddin) said: ‘Give me the money. I will dispense it to the dervishes. But as for those land deeds, keep them. There are many who long for them. Give them away to such persons.’”
What taluqdars thought
The attitude of the taluqdars was best expressed by Hanwant Singh, the Raja of Kalakankar, near Rae Bareli. During the mutiny, Hanwant Singh had given shelter to a British officer, and conveyed him to safety. While taking leave of the officer, Hanwant Singh told him:
Sahib, your countrymen came into this country and drove out our King. You sent your officers round the districts to examine the titles to the estates. At one blow you took from me lands which from time immemorial had been in my family. I submitted. Suddenly misfortune fell upon you. The people of the land rose against you. You came to me whom you had despoiled. I have saved you. But now – now I march at the head of my retainers to Lucknow to try and drive you from the country.