\[ P = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}, \quad Q = \{2, 3, 5, 6\} \]
The symmetric difference \( P \Delta Q \) is the set of elements which are in either \( P \) or \( Q \) but not in both:
\[ P \Delta Q = \{1, 4, 5, 6\} \]
\[ R = \{1, 3, 7, 8, 9\}, \quad S = \{2, 4, 9, 10\} \]
The symmetric difference \( R \Delta S \) is:
\[ R \Delta S = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10\} \]
We now compute the symmetric difference between the two results:
\[ (P \Delta Q) = \{1, 4, 5, 6\}, \quad (R \Delta S) = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10\} \]
Now combine and remove common elements (which appear in both sets):\ Common elements: \( 1, 4 \)
\[ \text{Final result: } \{2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10\} \]
\[ \text{Number of elements} = \boxed{7} \]
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)