The seating positions around the table are: \[ A \;-\; B \;-\; C \;-\; D \;-\; E \;-\; A \] The rule is:
From the problem, in the second ballot, C changes their vote to E, which causes B to win. This means that in the first ballot, C must have originally voted for B, thereby contributing to B's vote count in the first round.
Given the tie in the first round, and applying the voting restrictions, the only consistent scenario is: \[ \boxed{\text{C voted for B initially}} \]
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?