Question

Exploitation of poor by rich can be stemmed only if the state exercises complete control over agriculture and industrial production. But state control is beset by two evils; corruption and delay. The net result is that if man tries to escape from one evil, then he is trapped by another. Suffering hence is inescapable.
The argument presented above seems to imply the following conclusions. Identify the one which is least dubious. Apply common sense.

• A. Abolish agriculture and industry to free ourselves from all evil.
• B. Encourage austere life to avoid evil.
• C. Bridge the gap between rich and poor by taxing the rich heavily and passing the largesse to the poor.
• D. Man is, by nature, dishonest.

Hint:

When asked for the “least dubious” conclusion, eliminate extreme or metaphysical claims; prefer the modest, policy-grounded inference that addresses the stated problem.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

The problem discusses a potential solution to the exploitation of the poor by the rich through complete state control over agriculture and industry. However, such control comes with issues like corruption and delay, suggesting that avoiding one problem leads to another. Therefore, the solution aims to find a reasonable way to address the gap between rich and poor.

Let's evaluate the options provided:

• Abolish agriculture and industry to free ourselves from all evil: This is impractical and unrealistic as agriculture and industry are essential for societal functioning.
• Encourage austere life to avoid evil: While promoting simplicity may be beneficial, it doesn't directly address the exploitation issue or the wealth gap.
• Bridge the gap between rich and poor by taxing the rich heavily and passing the largesse to the poor: This approach targets the economic disparity directly, proposing a redistribution of wealth as a practical solution to reduce exploitation.
• Man is, by nature, dishonest: This is a general statement about human nature and doesn't provide a practical solution to the issue at hand.

Based on common sense and the problem's focus, the least dubious conclusion is to bridge the gap between rich and poor by taxing the rich heavily and passing the largesse to the poor. This proposal directly tackles economic inequality and offers a pragmatic method to reduce exploitation without relying entirely on state control.