Noted points:
Additionally, it is given in the question that the last location is A. The demand in the remaining places should be greater than A, meaning A's demand cannot be 70 units. Therefore, it is 50 units.
Regarding the demand of location D, it can be either 30 or 50 units. This implies that D should be placed before the location with a demand greater than or equal to 50 units.
The location visited before D is B, which has a demand of 60 units. It cannot be C because the values of C are greater than the values of B. Therefore, the order is C - B - D - A.
The distance covered:
Total distance covered: 12 + 4 + 12 + 7 = 35 km.
Noted points:
To summarize:
This plan ensures the delivery of 250 units with the specified constraints and the minimum total distance covered.
Therefore, the percentage of the total demand fulfilled under these conditions is 7.56%
The first location visited from the warehouse is A, and if A's demand is 50 units, C's demand should be less than 50 units, which is not possible. Therefore, the demand for both A and C is 70 units.
The order of locations visited is A(70 units) -> C(70 units), with distances covered: Warehouse to A (5 km), A to C (17 km), total distance covered = 5 + 17 = 22 km.
The remaining distance to be covered is 40 km - 22 km = 18 km.
The next leg of the route is C to B, covering 4 km, and B to D, covering 12 km, for a total of 16 km.
The remaining distance to be covered is 18 km, which can be achieved by going from C to D (6 km) and D to B (12 km).
To fulfill the conditions, D's demand is 50 units (60% probability) and B's demand is 40 units (30% probability).
The required value is calculated as 0.6 * 0.3 = 0.18, which is equivalent to 18%.
Therefore, the probability of the specified conditions being met is 18%.
Considering these constraints and given that the total route distance is 29 km, the order of locations visited is C - B - A - D.
The possible demands for each location:
The possible number of widgets delivered can be:
Therefore, the correct answer is option A.