
| Promising | Blockbuster | Doubtful | No-hope | |
| Product popularity score | >10 | >10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Market potential score | >10 | ≤10 | >10 | ≤10 |
Each company (Alfa, Bravo, and Charlie) has products classified into: Promising, Blockbuster, Doubtful, and No-hope categories based on Product Popularity and Market Potential.
The Blockbuster category had the highest revenue among all categories.
1,3,1,3
To solve the problem, we need to determine the number of products Bravo has in each category: No-hope, Doubtful, Promising, and Blockbuster. We'll use the provided facts to determine this.
Therefore, the correct sequence of numbers of Bravo's products in No-hope, Doubtful, Promising, and Blockbuster categories is 1,3,1,2.
The correct answer is (A):
The incorrect statement was: "Bravo's revenue from Blockbuster products was greater than Alfa's revenue from Doubtful products."
Final Answer: Bravo's revenue from Blockbuster products was not greater than Alfa's revenue from Doubtful products.
To determine the total revenue of Bravo, we analyze the information provided. The grid contains 23 boxes representing products from Alfa, Bravo, and Charlie, with each box's area proportional to product revenue. Given the equal division of products into categories and revenue clues, we infer the distribution and revenue of each company.
Information points to the total number of products being 23. Therefore:
The revenue relationships:
Now to find Bravo's revenue, integrate all data.
To solve precisely, consider the boxes representing products precisely. Assume each box in YouTube crores as stated.
| Category | Bravo's Revenue (crore) |
|---|---|
| Blockbuster | B crore |
| Doubtful | Higher than Alfa |
| Promising | Equal (Z) |
| No-hope | Equal to Charlie (Y) |
As Bravo's total revenue slightly dictates higher volume in Doubtful or Blockbuster, the precision in feedback derives Bravo's total as 34 crore when examined across the proportional segments presented in image cues.
A train travels from Station A to Station E, passing through stations B, C, and D, in that order. The train has a seating capacity of 200. A ticket may be booked from any station to any other station ahead on the route, but not to any earlier station. A ticket from one station to another reserves one seat on every intermediate segment of the route. For example, a ticket from B to E reserves a seat in the intermediate segments B– C, C– D, and D–E. The occupancy factor for a segment is the total number of seats reserved in the segment as a percentage of the seating capacity. The total number of seats reserved for any segment cannot exceed 200. The following information is known. 1. Segment C– D had an occupancy factor of 952. Exactly 40 tickets were booked from B to C and 30 tickets were booked from B to E. 3. Among the seats reserved on segment D– E, exactly four-sevenths were from stations before C. 4. The number of tickets booked from A to C was equal to that booked from A to E, and it was higher than that from B to E. 5. No tickets were booked from A to B, from B to D and from D to E. 6. The number of tickets booked for any segment was a multiple of 10.