Question

Country X is rich in flora and fauna and is considered one of the most beautiful places in the world. However, its economy has been struggling in recent times due to a recession. To address this, the government is considering transforming some of its scenic destinations into tourist attractions, intending to generate revenue and improve the country's economic condition. Should the government proceed with this plan?
Arguments:
I. Yes, turning these destinations into tourist spots will attract more foreign visitors, leading to an economic boost.
II. No, it will negatively impact the environment, as heavy tourism may result in population migration and a high influx of visitors, which could harm the country's flora and fauna.
III. No, there are other ways to improve the country's economy without relying on tourism.
IV. Yes, tourism helped boost the economy of neighbouring country Y last year, which was also facing a recession.

• A. Only argument IV is strong
• B. Only argument II is strong
• C. Arguments I and II are strong
• D. Arguments I, II, and IV are strong
• E. Arguments II and III are strong

Hint:

In strong–weak argument questions, strong arguments are practical, relevant, and directly related to the issue, while vague or generalized statements are usually weak.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

Step 1: Understand the core issue.
The government is considering tourism development as a means to overcome an economic recession, but must balance economic benefits with environmental concerns.
Step 2: Evaluate each argument.
Argument I is strong because increased tourism can logically lead to higher revenue and economic improvement.
Argument II is also strong, as environmental degradation due to excessive tourism is a valid and realistic concern, especially for a country rich in flora and fauna.
Argument III is weak because it is vague and does not directly address why tourism should not be pursued in this specific case.
Argument IV is strong since it provides a relevant real-world example where tourism helped a neighbouring country recover economically.
Step 3: Identify the correct combination.
Arguments I, II, and IV are all logical, relevant, and directly related to the issue under discussion.
Final Answer:
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (D)}} \]