The grammar \(G\) generates strings of the form:
\[
w = a^p c b^q,
\]
where the derivation of \(c\) adds one \(b\) and one \(a\). Hence, the relationships between \(n_a(w), n_b(w), n_c(w)\) can be analyzed:
Option (A): Incorrect. While \(n_a(w)\) is often greater than \(n_b(w)\), there is no guarantee, as \(n_a(w)\) and \(n_b(w)\) depend on the specific derivation.
Option (B): Correct. Since the derivation adds at least two \(a\)'s for every \(c\), the inequality \(n_a(w)>n_c(w) - 2\) holds.
Option (C): Correct. Each derivation of \(S \to aSbS\) adds one \(b\) for every \(c\), making \(n_c(w) = n_b(w) + 1\).
Option (D): Incorrect. The number of \(c\)'s is not necessarily twice the number of \(b\)'s.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{\text{(B), (C)}}
\]