Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question requires arranging the given spices in increasing order (lowest to highest) based on their production volume in India for the year 2021-22, according to final horticulture estimates.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
The approach involves recalling or referencing the production data for each spice from the specified government report and then ordering them from the smallest production quantity to the largest.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Based on the final estimates for horticulture crops for 2021-22 released by the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, the approximate production figures are as follows:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{(B) Tamarind: The production of tamarind is the lowest among the given options, estimated at around 2.01 lakh tonnes. } \\ \bullet & \text{(D) Coriander: The production of coriander (seed spice) is estimated to be around 8.04 lakh tonnes. } \\ \bullet & \text{(A) Turmeric: Turmeric production is significantly higher, estimated at around 13.31 lakh tonnes. } \\ \bullet & \text{(C) Garlic: Garlic has the highest production among the four, estimated at a substantial 32.09 lakh tonnes. } \\ \end{array}\]
Arranging these in increasing order of production:
Tamarind (B) \(\rightarrow\) Coriander (D) \(\rightarrow\) Turmeric (A) \(\rightarrow\) Garlic (C).
Step 4: Final Answer:
The correct sequence in increasing order of production is (B), (D), (A), (C).
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |