Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question requires arranging the given fruits in descending (decreasing) order based on the area of land used for their cultivation in India, according to the final estimates for the year 2021-22.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
The approach is to recall or find the approximate cultivation area for each fruit from the specified horticulture report and then sort them from largest to smallest area.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Based on the Horticulture Statistics at a Glance and related reports for 2021-22, the approximate area of cultivation for these fruits in India is as follows:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{(A) Pomegranate: The area under cultivation is significant, approximately 2.9 lakh hectares. } \\ \bullet & \text{(D) Papaya: The area under cultivation is around 1.5 lakh hectares. } \\ \bullet & \text{(B) Pineapple: The area under cultivation is approximately 1.1 lakh hectares. } \\ \bullet & \text{(C) Plum: As a temperate fruit, its cultivation is limited to specific regions, and the area is much smaller, around 0.3 lakh hectares. } \\ \end{array}\]
Arranging these in decreasing order of area:
1. Pomegranate (A) - \(\approx 2.9\) lakh Ha
2. Papaya (D) - \(\approx 1.5\) lakh Ha
3. Pineapple (B) - \(\approx 1.1\) lakh Ha
4. Plum (C) - \(\approx 0.3\) lakh Ha
The correct decreasing order is (A), (D), (B), (C).
Step 4: Final Answer:
The correct sequence in decreasing order of cultivation area is Pomegranate, Papaya, Pineapple, and Plum. This corresponds to option (A), (D), (B), (C).
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |