Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters Faculty (F), Research (R), Placements (P), and Infrastructure (I) respectively.
Given inequalities:
From these, we derive:
This implies the order: \( b > d > c \)
The weights \( a, b, c, d \) are from the set \( \{0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4\} \).
Let’s consider possibilities. From \( b > d > c \), \( b = 0.4 \), \( d = 0.3 \), and \( c = 0.2 \). The remaining value \( a = 0.1 \).
Now check inequality (i):
\[ 2d = 0.6 > a + b = 0.1 + 0.4 = 0.5 \quad \text{✓} \]
Hence, the correct assignment is:
Answer: Weight of Faculty parameter (a) is 0.1
Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters F, R, P, and I respectively.
Given inequalities:
From the above, we deduce:
This gives us the ranking: \( b > d > c \)
The weights \( a, b, c, d \) are all from the set \( \{0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4\} \).
If \( d = 0.1 \) or \( 0.2 \), then \( 2d \) cannot be greater than \( a + b \). So the only valid values for \( d \) are 0.3 or 0.4. But since \( b > d \), we must have:
Now, using inequality (i):
\[ 2d > a + b \Rightarrow 0.6 > a + 0.4 \Rightarrow a < 0.2 \Rightarrow a = 0.1 \]
Remaining weight: \( c = 0.2 \)
Final weights:
According to the weighted scoring system, the number of colleges that received an AAA rating (presumably above a certain threshold score) is:
Answer: 3
What is the highest overall score among the eight colleges?
Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters F, R, P, and I respectively.
Given constraints:
From these equations:
This implies the following weight ranking: \[ b > d > c \]
Weights are one of: \( \{0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4\} \).
If \( d = 0.1 \) or \( d = 0.2 \), then \( 2d \) cannot exceed \( a + b \) unless both \( a \) and \( b \) are very small, which is not possible. So: \[ d = 0.3 \text{ or } 0.4 \] But since \( b > d \), we must have: \[ b = 0.4, \quad d = 0.3 \] Using inequality (i): \[ 2d > a + b \Rightarrow 0.6 > a + 0.4 \Rightarrow a < 0.2 \Rightarrow a = 0.1 \] Remaining weight is: \[ c = 0.2 \]
Final assigned weights:
Using these weights, the maximum weighted score among the eight colleges turns out to be:
Answer: 48
The correct answer is (C):
Let \( a, b, c, d \) be the weights of parameters F, R, P, and I respectively.
Given inequalities:
Simplifying the inequalities:
So, the relative order of weights is: \[ b > d > c \quad \text{and from (i)} \quad 2d > a + b \]
Given possible weights: \( 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 \) in some order.
Now, eliminate inconsistent combinations:
Thus:
From inequality (i): \( 2d > a + b \Rightarrow 0.6 > a + 0.4 \Rightarrow a < 0.2 \Rightarrow a = 0.1 \)
Remaining weight: \( c = 0.2 \)
Final weights:
Final Insight:
No college has a total score between 31 and 40 (inclusive), based on these weight combinations and the scoring data (assumed from context).
Answer: 0
A | B | C | D | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 4 | 4 | ? | 4 |
3 | ? | 5 | ? | 4 |
? | 3 | 3 | ? | 4 |
? | ? | ? | ? | 4.25 |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4.25 |