To solve the problem, we need to find the species that are isoelectronic with Ni(CO)4.
1. Determining the Number of Electrons in Ni(CO)4:
Ni(CO)4 has the following number of electrons:
$ \text{Ni} = 28, \, \text{CO} = 14, \, \text{so} \, 28 + 4(14) = 28 + 56 = 84 \, \text{electrons}$.
2. Checking Other Species:
Now, we check other species to see if they have 84 electrons, considering both the atomic numbers and any charges.
3. Species and Their Electron Counts:
4. Conclusion:
Only [Cr(CO)4]4- has 84 electrons and is isoelectronic with Ni(CO)4.
Final Answer:
The final answer is $\boxed{1}$.
Let's carefully reconsider the problem and check for isoelectronic species with Ni(CO)4.
Step 1: Calculate total valence electrons for Ni(CO)4
- Ni: 10 valence electrons (3d84s2)
- 4 CO ligands × 2 electrons each = 8 electrons
- Total = 10 + 8 = 18 electrons
Step 2: Calculate valence electrons for each species:
Step 3: Consider geometry and common electron counts:
- Ni(CO)4 is tetrahedral with 18 electrons.
- Fe(CO)5 is trigonal bipyramidal, not tetrahedral.
- [Co(CO)3]3− and [Cr(CO)4]4− are anionic complexes, often unstable or uncommon in this exact form.
- Among the given, only Fe(CO)5 reliably matches the 18-electron rule and common stable complexes.
Therefore, considering stable and well-known complexes, only Fe(CO)5 is isoelectronic with Ni(CO)4.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{1}
\]
Let $ P(x_1, y_1) $ and $ Q(x_2, y_2) $ be two distinct points on the ellipse $$ \frac{x^2}{9} + \frac{y^2}{4} = 1 $$ such that $ y_1 > 0 $, and $ y_2 > 0 $. Let $ C $ denote the circle $ x^2 + y^2 = 9 $, and $ M $ be the point $ (3, 0) $. Suppose the line $ x = x_1 $ intersects $ C $ at $ R $, and the line $ x = x_2 $ intersects $ C $ at $ S $, such that the $ y $-coordinates of $ R $ and $ S $ are positive. Let $ \angle ROM = \frac{\pi}{6} $ and $ \angle SOM = \frac{\pi}{3} $, where $ O $ denotes the origin $ (0, 0) $. Let $ |XY| $ denote the length of the line segment $ XY $. Then which of the following statements is (are) TRUE?