Fuel consumption rate: 1 metric ton per 0.5 AU
Total distance: 1.5 AU
Total fuel consumption:
\(\frac{1 \text{ metric ton}}{0.5 \text{ AU}} = \frac{X \text{ metric tons}}{1.5 \text{ AU}}\)
\(X = \left( \frac{1 \text{ metric ton}}{0.5 \text{ AU}} \right) \times 1.5 \text{ AU} = 3 \text{ metric tons}\)
Total distance the spacecraft can travel with a full tank:
Fuel capacity: 100 metric tons
Consumption rate: 1 metric ton per 0.5 AU
\(\text{Total distance} = \text{Fuel capacity} \times \text{Distance per metric ton}\)
\(\text{Total distance} = 100 \text{ metric tons} \times \frac{0.5 \text{ AU}}{\text{metric ton}} = 50 \text{ AU}\)
Number of waystations:
Distance between waystations on the outer route: 3 AU
\(\text{Number of waystations} = \frac{\text{Total distance}}{\text{Distance between waystations}}\)
\(\text{Number of waystations} = \frac{50 \text{ AU}}{3 \text{ AU/waystation}} \approx 16.67 \text{ waystations}\)
Since a spacecraft can't traverse a fraction of a waystation, round down to the nearest whole number. So answer is 16
New distance between waystations on the inner route.
Original distance: 1.5 AU
Reduction: 20%
New distance: \(1.5 \text{ AU} \times (1 - 0.2) = 1.2 \text{ AU}\)
New fuel consumption rate for the new spacecraft.
Standard fuel consumption rate: 1 metric ton per 0.5 AU
New spacecraft fuel efficiency: 1.2 times the standard
New fuel consumption rate: \(\frac{1 \text{ metric ton}}{0.5 \text{ AU} \times 1.2} = \frac{1}{0.6} \text{ metric ton per AU} = \frac{5}{3} \text{ metric tons per AU}\)
Number of waystations for both spacecraft.
Standard spacecraft:
Fuel capacity: 100 metric tons
Fuel consumption rate: 1 metric ton per 0.5 AU or 2 metric tons per AU
\(\text{Number of waystations} = \frac{\left(\frac{\text{Fuel capacity}}{\text{Fuel consumption rate}}\right)}{\text{Distance per waystation}}\)
\(\text{Number of waystations} = \frac{\left(\frac{100 \text{ metric tons}}{2 \text{ metric tons/AU}}\right)}{1.5 \text{ AU}}\)
\(\text{Number of waystations} = \frac{50}{1.5} = 33.33 \text{ waystations (rounded down to 33 waystations)}\)
New spacecraft:
Fuel capacity: 100 metric tons
\(\text{Fuel consumption rate} = \frac{5}{3} \text{ metric tons per AU}\)
\(\text{Number of waystations} = \frac{\left( \frac{\text{Fuel capacity}}{\text{Fuel consumption rate}} \right)}{\text{Distance per waystation}}\)
\(\text{Number of waystations} = \frac{\left( \frac{100 \text{ metric tons}}{\frac{5}{3} \text{ metric tons/AU}} \right)}{1.2 \text{ AU}} = 60 \text{ waystations}\)
Percentage increase.
\(\text{Percentage increase} = \left( \frac{\left( \text{New number of waystations} - \text{Old number of waystations} \right)}{\text{Old number of waystations}} \right) \times 100 = \left( \frac{60 - 33}{33} \right) \times 100 = \left( \frac{27}{33} \right) \times 100 \approx 81.82\%\)
Total distance in kilometers:
Distance in AU: 30 AU
Conversion factor: 1 AU = 150 million km
\(\text{Total distance} = 30 \text{ AU} \times 150 \text{ million km/AU} = 4.5 \text{ billion km}\)
Travel time:
Distance: 4.5 billion km
Speed: 50,000 km/h
\(\text{Time} = \frac{\text{Distance}}{\text{Speed}} = \frac{4.5 \text{ billion km}}{50,000 \text{ km/h}} = 90,000 \text{ hours}\)
Assuming
Original fuel price: P
Original distance between waystations: D
Original number of waystations between Jupiter and Neptune: N
Original total fuel cost:
Fuel consumption is directly proportional to distance.
\(\text{Total fuel cost} = P \times N \times D\)
New situation:
New fuel price: 1.2P (20% increase)
New distance between waystations: 1.1D (10% increase)
Number of waystations will decrease as the distance between them increases, but for simplicity, let's assume it remains N (this assumption might slightly overestimate the cost increase).
New total fuel cost:
\(\text{New total fuel cost} = 1.2P \times N \times 1.1D = 1.32 \times (P \times N \times D)\)
Percentage increase in total fuel cost:
=\(\left( \frac{\left( \text{New total fuel cost} - \text{Original total fuel cost} \right)}{\text{Original total fuel cost}} \right) \times 100\)
\(=\left( \frac{1.32 \times P \times N \times D - P \times N \times D}{P \times N \times D} \right) \times 100 \\= \left( \frac{(1.32 - 1) \times P \times N \times D}{P \times N \times D} \right) \times 100 = \left( \frac{0.32 \times P \times N \times D}{P \times N \times D} \right) \times 100 = 0.32 \times 100 = 32\%\)
The plots below depict and compare the average monthly incomes (in Rs. ’000) of males and females in ten cities of India in the years 2005 and 2015. The ten cities, marked A-J in the records, are of different population sizes. For a fair comparison, to adjust for inflation, incomes for both the periods are scaled to 2025 prices. Each red dot represents the average monthly income of females in a particular city in a particular year, while each blue dot represents the average monthly income of males in a particular city in a particular year. The gender gap for a city, for a particular year, is defined as the absolute value of the average monthly income of males, minus the average monthly income of females, in that year.
A bar graph shows the number of students in 5 departments of a college. If the average number of students is 240 and the number of students in the Science department is 320, how many students are there in total in the other four departments?