A pastor had eaten at restaurant with his troup of ten and his family. It is a norm to tip the waiter and about 20% of a waiter’s salary comes from these tips. However, while paying the bill, the pastor crossed out the automatic 18% tip charged for parties of more than eight and wrote “I give God 10% why do you get 18%?” above his signature. The chagrined waitress at the restaurant posted a photo of this on the social media. She was subsequently red for violating company’s policy on customer privacy.
This would have been understandable if the restaurant had not posted just 2 weeks ago a customer receipt that was complimenting them. Social media and social activists came heavily upon the management’s ambivalent stand and the ring of the waitress. In response, the company posted a note on their social media page defending their actions. This quickly drew over 10,000 comments, mostly negative, to which the management started responding by posting the same note over and over again. There were also accusations of the company deleting negative comments and blocking users. The restaurant also experienced a sizable drop in their footfall.
Who/what is the main cause for the situation becoming unmanageable?
Show Hint
- The pastor for flouting the norm of restaurant.
- The waitress for violating customer privacy.
- The management for not taking action against the pastor.
- The management for giving out disproportionate punishment to waitress.
- The management for removing negative comments from the social media.
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
The pastor’s act of striking out the automatic 18% tip and writing a rude comment was inappropriate, but it was an isolated customer behavior. Normally, such incidents would not spiral into a large-scale crisis.
Step 2: The waitress’s action
The waitress violated company policy by posting the receipt online, but even this could have been resolved with a lighter punishment or internal handling.
Step 3: The management’s response
The crisis escalated when management responded harshly by firing the waitress, which was perceived as disproportionate punishment. This action triggered widespread public backlash, fueled by social media. The company’s further mishandling — repetitive responses and deleting negative comments — only deepened the outrage.
Step 4: Identifying the root cause
Although multiple players contributed to the situation, the event became
unmanageable only when management’s excessive punishment turned public opinion against them. This was the turning point leading to tens of thousands of negative comments and a decline in business.
Why not the other options? \begin{itemize} \item
Option A: The pastor started the issue but did not make the situation unmanageable. \item
Option B: The waitress violated privacy but her act alone would not have caused such a major fallout. \item
Option C: Not punishing the pastor was not central to the escalation. \item
Option E: Removing negative comments worsened things later but was not the \emph{main cause} of the crisis. \end{itemize} Thus, the main cause was the management’s disproportionate punishment of the waitress.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{D. The management for giving out disproportionate punishment to waitress.}} \]
The downward spiral continued for the restaurant as the management persisted in defending their actions and argued with those who criticised them. By the following week, the original post had generated over 18,000 negative comments.
Which of the following is the best way forward for the restaurant at this juncture?
Show Hint
- Unconditionally restore the waitress to her former position and salary on the ground that she was never at fault in the first place.
- Apologise to and reinstate the waitress and ask her to apologize for her breach of customer privacy and post both the apologies on social media.
- Reinstate the waitress provided she apologises for her breach of customer privacy and post that apology on the restaurant’s social media page.
- Reinstate the waitress if and only if she apologizes for her breach of customer privacy and posts that apology on her social media page.
- Recruit two waitresses at a higher wage but stick to the original decision of firing the waitress.
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
The restaurant is facing a public relations crisis, with over 18,000 negative comments, largely due to its defensive stance and lack of accountability. To regain public trust, it must demonstrate responsibility, fairness, and transparency.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
(A)
Unconditional reinstatement.
While supportive of the waitress, this does not address the alleged breach of privacy and may appear as though the restaurant is ignoring the issue. Incomplete solution.
(B)
Mutual apology and reinstatement.
This option balances both sides. The restaurant apologises for its harsh handling, while the waitress acknowledges the privacy breach. Posting both apologies on social media ensures public visibility and transparency, helping to rebuild credibility. This is the most practical and reputation-restoring choice.
(C)
Waitress-only apology on restaurant’s page.
This places full blame on the waitress and avoids the restaurant’s accountability. The public may see this as unfair, worsening the backlash.
(D)
Waitress-only apology on her personal page.
This shifts the entire responsibility to the waitress and absolves the restaurant of any role in the controversy. The public would likely perceive this as arrogant and unfair.
(E)
Recruiting new staff.
This ignores public sentiment entirely and could intensify negative reactions. It fails to repair reputation and could escalate the boycott.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Option (B) is the best way forward because it promotes shared accountability, public reconciliation, and a visible attempt to correct mistakes.
Final Answer: B. Apologise to and reinstate the waitress and ask her to apologize, with both apologies posted on social media.
Top Questions on Statements and Conclusions
Humane Dynamix is a leadership training organization based in Mumbai. Established in 2015, the organization is gradually becoming a leader in behavioral training. In the organization, trainers are assigned to training projects based on their expertise. Corporates seek behavioral training services on a regular basis, from Humane Dynamix, for upskilling their executives. Humane Dynamix is headed by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), to whom the Training Assignment Officer (TAO) reports. The TAO position rotates among the senior trainers for a fixed tenure; the CEO assigns this position to a senior trainer.
Companies, desirous of hiring Humane Dynamix, share their training needs with the organization. The TAO assigns a trainer to the client. Typically, the satisfied client requests for a particular trainer that the client is satisfied, giving repeat business to Humane Dynamix from the same client company. However, the TAO takes the nal call. Years of training experience plays a big role in client satisfaction, and hence, senior trainers conduct most training programs while the newly recruited trainers apprentice with them. However, the senior trainers have the autonomy to decide on who they want to accept as an apprentice..
Further, during a training program, the senior trainer takes most of the sessions, if not all, while the apprentice helps the senior trainers to organize their sessions, and occasionally take a few sessions. As the apprentices gain experience, they start getting their own independent projects, but that typically takes quite some time..
Dheeraj, a senior trainer, takes over as the TAO. As soon as he assumes the office, the CEO shares a concern with him: “We have a lot of young trainers who we have recently recruited. Since they are not known to the outside world, they do not get enough opportunities. Many of them are impatient to prove their mettle. Unless they are assigned more programs, we risk losing them rapidly.”- XAT - 2025
- Decision Making
- Statements and Conclusions
- Select the conclusion that best follows from the statement given below.
Statement:
Some mangoes are exported to Europe and most mangoes are consumed in India. In India, some mangoes are used for preparing mango juice and some are used for making jellies. All mangoes are consumed by humans unless they are raw mangoes. All raw mangoes are exported outside India.
Conclusions:
I. All the mangoes exported to Europe are unfit for human consumption.
II. Mango juice can also be prepared with raw mangoes.
III. Most mangoes are consumed in India in the form of mango jelly.
IV. No raw mango was used to prepare jelly.- NPAT - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Conclusions
- Select the conclusion that best follows from the statements given below.
Statements:
In a university, some students can speak English and German, but not French.
Some students can speak French and Japanese, but not Korean.
Some students can speak German and Korean, but not Japanese.
Some students can speak English and Japanese, but not Korean.
Conclusions:
I. All students who speak Japanese can speak English.
II. Among the students who speak German, some can speak English and some can speak Korean.
III. Students who speak French can speak German as well.- NPAT - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Conclusions
- Select the conclusion that best follows from the statement given below.
Statement:
In a library, some members were issued non-fiction non-academic books and these were returned exactly 3 weeks later. Some members were issued non-academic fiction books written by American authors and they returned these books within 20 days. More than half the members were issued academic textbooks and these were returned after 20 days.
Conclusions:
I. The non-academic fiction books were borrowed by library members for the shortest duration.
II. Most library members prefer to read non-academic non-fiction books.
III. Academic textbooks were perhaps the most issued books in the library.
IV. Non-academic fiction books are preferred more than the non-academic non-fiction books by library members.- NPAT - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Conclusions
- Select the conclusion that best follows from the statement given below.
Statement:
No one who likes to watch baseball likes to watch basketball, and all those who like to watch basketball also like to watch football.
Conclusions:
I. All those who like to watch football like to watch baseball.
II. No one who likes to watch baseball likes to watch football.
III. Some of those who like to watch football like to watch baseball.- NPAT - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
- Statements and Conclusions
Questions Asked in XAT exam
- What is the name of the AI-based app recently launched by the central government of India to provide study materials in regional languages?
- XAT - 2025
- Scientific Developments
- Which shipyard built INS Tushil, a stealth guided missile frigate, commissioned on Dec 9, 2024?
- XAT - 2025
- General Science
Match the following authors with their respective works.
Authors Books 1. Andy Weir A. Dune 2. Cixin Liu B. The Time Machine 3. Stephen Hawking C. The Brief History of Time 4. HG Wells D. The Martian 5. Frank Herbert E. The Three Body Problem - XAT - 2025
- Books and Authors
- Who won the SVERIGES RIKSBANK PRIZE in ECONOMIC Sciences in memory of Alfred Nobel 2024 for studies of how institutions are formed and affect prosperity?
- XAT - 2025
- Economy
- Who was the world’s first female to be elected as the prime minister of a country?
- XAT - 2025
- Famous personalities and their contributions