Question

A. Painting and music is art.
B. Art is symptom of culture.
C. Culture and art are complementary.
D. Music is a form of art.
E. Painting is a form of art.
F. Music shows culture.

• A. BDF
• B. AEF
• C. ACE
• D. CEF

Hint:

Always look for a base statement that introduces the theme (like A), a specific case that supports it (like E), and a result or implication (like F) to form a strong logical trio.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Let's analyze option (b): AEF A: Painting and music is art.
E: Painting is a form of art.
F: Music shows culture.
Step-by-step logic: - Statement A introduces the idea that both painting and music are forms of art.
- Statement E reinforces this by specifying: painting is a form of art.
- Statement F builds a connection from music to culture, implying that art (through music) reflects culture.
So we have: \[ \text{Painting and music} \Rightarrow \text{Forms of art (A and E)} \Rightarrow \text{Music reflects culture (F)} \] Thus, A, E, and F form a tightly knit logical set that aligns with a consistent theme: “art” (both painting and music) and its role in expressing culture. Now evaluate the other options: (a) BDF: - B: Art is a symptom of culture. - D: Music is a form of art. - F: Music shows culture. Although individually valid, they lack a direct foundational link like A or E which define the domain (art). The structure feels incomplete without A or E. (c) ACE: - C: Culture and art are complementary. - A: Painting and music is art. - E: Painting is a form of art. Though thematic, it lacks the extension to how art reflects culture (which F provides). (d) CEF: - C: Culture and art are complementary. - E: Painting is a form of art. - F: Music shows culture. E and F are distinct, and without a base statement like A, the bridge is weaker. Conclusion: Option AEF is the most logically consistent and well-structured group.