Let the required number be \( N \) such that:
\[ N \equiv 2 \mod 4, \quad N \equiv 3 \mod 5, \quad N \equiv 4 \mod 6 \]
Rewriting all as:
\[ N \equiv -2 \mod 4 \Rightarrow N \equiv 2 \mod 4 \\ N \equiv -2 \mod 5 \Rightarrow N \equiv 3 \mod 5 \\ N \equiv -2 \mod 6 \Rightarrow N \equiv 4 \mod 6 \]
So in all cases:
\[ N + 2 \equiv 0 \mod 4,5,6 \\ \Rightarrow N + 2 = \text{LCM}(4,5,6) = 60 \\ \Rightarrow N = 60 - 2 = \boxed{58} \]
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?