A. All good bridge players play good chess.
B. Many good chess players are not bridge players.
C. Goren is a good bridge player.
D. Goren plays chess well.
E. Spassky plays chess well.
F. Spassky plays bridge badly.
Show Hint
Use combinations that show rule, contrast, and example to establish strong logical reasoning.
Let us examine option (a): ABDA: All good bridge players play good chess. B: Many good chess players are not bridge players. D: Goren plays chess well.
- A gives a general relationship.
- D provides a real-life illustration of A.
- B gives a contrast, refining the directionality. Conclusion: A general rule + example + contrasting exception.