Comprehension

Writing is both my vocation and my avocation: that’s all I do. 
You may wonder why I should write a genealogy. Well, to begin with, my story is interesting. And, next, I am a mystery -more so than a tree or a sunset or even a ash of lightning. But, sadly, I am taken for granted by those who use me, as if I were a mere incident and without background. This supercilious attitude relegates me to the level of the commonplace. This is a species of the grievous error in which mankind cannot too long persist without peril. For, as a wise man, G. K. Chesterton, observed, “We are perishing for want of wonder, not for want of wonders.”
I, simple though I appear to be, merit your wonder and awe, a claim I shall attempt to prove. In fact, if you can understand me-no, that’s too much to ask of anyone - if you can become aware of the miraculousness that I symbolize, you can help save the freedom mankind is so unhappily losing. I have a profound lesson to teach. And I can teach this lesson better than an automobile or an airplane or a mechanical dishwasher because - well, because I am seemingly so simple.
Simple? Yet, not a single person on the face of this earth knows how to make me. This sounds fantastic, doesn’t it? Especially when you realize that there are about one and one-half billion of my kind produced in the U.S. each year.
Pick me up and look me over. What do you see? Not much meets the eye - there’s some wood, lacquer, the printed labeling, graphite lead, a bit of metal, and an eraser

Question: 1

“I” in the passage, most likely, refers to:

Show Hint

When “I” appears in comprehension passages, always check for personification. Often, non-living objects like books, pens, or pencils are given human voice to narrate their role. Look for contextual clues before assuming it is the author.
Updated On: Aug 23, 2025
  • the author of the passage
  • a geometry box
  • a study table
  • a pencil
  • the evolution of a book
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

In the given passage, the speaker (“I”) is not a human narrator but an object. The answer key confirms that the reference is to a pencil. This can be inferred because: \begin{itemize} \item A pencil can “speak” metaphorically in many literary contexts, describing its journey, use, and significance. \item Options like “author of the passage” (A) are misleading, since authors rarely use “I” to hide themselves in such simple RC questions. \item A geometry box (B) or study table (C) is less likely, as they are static and not commonly personified in such passages. \item “Evolution of a book” (E) is too abstract for the direct “I” reference. \end{itemize} Thus, “I” most likely refers to a pencil, which fits with literary personification and is the answer provided.

Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{D. a pencil}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

A “supercilious attitude” in this passage implies:

Show Hint

When interpreting attitude words like “supercilious,” always recall their emotional tone: arrogance, disdain, or haughtiness. Distinguish this from mere ignorance, dullness, or lack of curiosity.
Updated On: Aug 23, 2025
  • Failure to perceive the mystery of the sunset.
  • Arrogance of treating all simple things as trivial.
  • Lack of curiosity in seeking the mystery behind the lighting.
  • A tendency to break down intricacies of creation into its simple parts.
  • Prosaic attitude immune to the mysteries of the world.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the word “supercilious.”
The word “supercilious” originates from Latin (\textit{supercilium}, meaning "eyebrow" or "haughtiness") and refers to a behavior or attitude that is arrogant, disdainful, or condescending. Someone with a supercilious attitude looks down on others or trivializes things that might be meaningful to them.

Step 2: Matching with the passage’s implication.
The passage suggests that a person with a supercilious attitude fails not because of ignorance, but because of arrogance — they dismiss what others may consider beautiful, mysterious, or profound as if it were insignificant or trivial.

Step 3: Evaluating options.
(A) “Failure to perceive the mystery of the sunset.” — This focuses on inability or ignorance, not arrogance. Incorrect.
(B) “Arrogance of treating all simple things as trivial.” — This matches the definition of “supercilious” exactly, as it highlights arrogance and disdain. Correct.
(C) “Lack of curiosity in seeking the mystery behind the lighting.” — This implies indifference, not arrogance. Incorrect.
(D) “A tendency to break down intricacies of creation into its simple parts.” — This describes analysis or reductionism, but not arrogance. Incorrect.
(E) “Prosaic attitude immune to the mysteries of the world.” — This implies dullness or insensitivity, not arrogance. Incorrect.


Step 4: Conclusion.
Only option (B) captures the essence of “supercilious” — arrogance or disdain toward things that might otherwise be valued.

Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{B. Arrogance of treating all simple things as trivial}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in XAT exam

View More Questions