With all other parameters constant, the fabric with a low cover factor effectively transmits water vapor by a diffusion mechanism in comparison with that of fabric with a high cover factor due to \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\)
Step 1: Define "Cover Factor." Cover factor is a measure of how much of the area of a fabric is covered by yarn. A low cover factor means the yarns are spaced far apart, creating an open structure. A high cover factor means the yarns are packed tightly together, creating a dense structure.
Step 2: Understand water vapor transmission. This property relates to breathability. Water vapor (sweat) needs to be able to pass through the fabric from the skin to the outside to keep the wearer comfortable. This happens mainly by diffusion through the air gaps in the fabric.
Step 3: Relate cover factor to the fabric structure. A fabric with a low cover factor is more open and has larger interstices (gaps) between the yarns. This means it contains more air space. A fabric with a high cover factor is dense and has very little air space.
Step 4: Connect structure to function. Water vapor diffuses much more easily through air than through a solid fiber. Therefore, the fabric with more air space (the one with the low cover factor) will allow for much faster and more effective transmission of water vapor.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |