Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks to classify the passage's style and purpose.
Step 2: Analyzing the Passage and Options:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{Argumentative: An argumentative piece aims to persuade the reader of a particular point of view through logical reasoning and evidence. While the passage has a thesis, its primary goal isn't to argue a point logically but to share a personal insight. } \\ \bullet & \text{Descriptive: A descriptive piece focuses on creating a vivid picture of a person, place, or thing. While the passage contains descriptive elements (the pigeon, the tests), its main purpose is not just to describe but to explore the meaning of those descriptions. } \\ \bullet & \text{Reflective: A reflective piece explores the writer's personal thoughts, feelings, and memories, often connecting a specific experience to a broader idea or lesson. This perfectly describes the passage. The writer uses the experience in the nursing home to reflect on the importance of "simple things" in life. The final lines ("And as I write this, I am reminded of other consolations...") are a clear example of reflection. } \\ \bullet & \text{Narrative: A narrative tells a story, usually with a clear plot, characters, and sequence of events. While the passage contains a short narrative about the nursing home stay, this story serves a larger reflective purpose. The primary goal is not just to tell the story, but to convey the lesson learned from it. } \\ \end{array}\]
Step 3: Final Answer:
Given that the passage uses a personal story to explore a larger theme about life and sanity, "Reflective" is the most fitting term.
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Complete Justice} & \text{(I) Article 137} \\ \hline \text{(B) Special Leave Petition} & \text{(II) Article 131} \\ \hline \text{(C) Review of the Judgments} & \text{(III) Article 142} \\ \hline \text{(D) Original Jurisdiction} & \text{(IV) Article 136} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match List-I with List-II
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]