Step 1: Understanding the Concept.
Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines "consideration." It states that when, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.
Step 2: Explanation.
This definition clearly establishes that consideration in India may move from the promisee or any other person, provided it is done at the desire of the promisor. This is different from the position under English law, where consideration must move only from the promisee.
- Option (A): Incorrect — reflects the English law principle, not Indian law.
- Option (B): Incorrect — consideration does not move from the promisor.
- Option (C): Incorrect — consideration cannot move from the promisor; it must move from the promisee or a third person at the promisor's desire.
- Option (D): Correct — accurately states the Indian legal position as per Section 2(d).
Step 3: Final Answer.
Hence, under Indian law, consideration can move from the promisee or any other person, making Option (D) the correct answer.
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]