Question:

Which one of the following is not true of a lossless line?

Show Hint


Input impedance of a lossless line: \(Z_{in} = Z_0 \frac{Z_L + jZ_0 \tan(\beta l)}{Z_0 + jZ_L \tan(\beta l)}\).
Shorted line (\(Z_L=0\)): \(Z_{in} = jZ_0 \tan(\beta l)\).
Open-circuited line (\(Z_L=\infty\)): \(Z_{in} = -jZ_0 \cot(\beta l)\).
Matched line (\(Z_L=Z_0\)): \(Z_{in} = Z_0\).
For \(l=\lambda/8\), \(\beta l = \pi/4\), \(\tan(\pi/4)=1\). For shorted line, \(Z_{in} = jZ_0\).
For \(l=\lambda/4\), \(\beta l = \pi/2\), \(\tan(\pi/2)=\infty\). For shorted line, \(Z_{in} = j\infty\) (open circuit).
For \(l=\lambda/2\), \(\beta l = \pi\), \(\tan(\pi)=0\). For shorted line, \(Z_{in} = 0\) (short circuit). Input impedance repeats every \(\lambda/2\).
Updated On: May 22, 2025
  • \( Z_{in} = -jZ_0 \) for a shorted line with \( l = \frac{\lambda}{8} \)
  • \( Z_{in} = j\infty \) for a shorted line with \( l = \frac{\lambda}{4} \)
  • \( Z_{in} = Z_0 \) for a matched line
  • At a half-wavelength from load \( Z_{in} = Z_L \) and repeats for every half wavelength there after
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

For a lossless transmission line of characteristic impedance \(Z_0\) and length \(l\), terminated by a load \(Z_L\), the input impedance \(Z_{in}\) is given by: \[ Z_{in} = Z_0 \frac{Z_L + jZ_0 \tan(\beta l)}{Z_0 + jZ_L \tan(\beta l)} \] where \(\beta = 2\pi/\lambda\). Let's analyze each statement for a lossless line: (a) Shorted line (\(Z_L = 0\)), \(l = \lambda/8\). \(\beta l = (2\pi/\lambda) (\lambda/8) = \pi/4\). So \(\tan(\beta l) = \tan(\pi/4) = 1\). \(Z_{in} = Z_0 \frac{0 + jZ_0(1)}{Z_0 + j(0)(1)} = Z_0 \frac{jZ_0}{Z_0} = jZ_0\). The statement says \(Z_{in} = -jZ_0\). This is FALSE. \(Z_{in}\) should be \(+jZ_0\). So, this statement is "not true". (b) Shorted line (\(Z_L = 0\)), \(l = \lambda/4\). \(\beta l = (2\pi/\lambda) (\lambda/4) = \pi/2\). So \(\tan(\beta l) = \tan(\pi/2) = \infty\). For this case, it's easier to use \(Z_{in} = jZ_0 \tan(\beta l)\) for a shorted line. \(Z_{in} = jZ_0 \tan(\pi/2) = jZ_0 (\infty) = j\infty\). This represents an open circuit. The statement says \(Z_{in} = j\infty\). This is TRUE. (c) Matched line (\(Z_L = Z_0\)). \(Z_{in} = Z_0 \frac{Z_0 + jZ_0 \tan(\beta l)}{Z_0 + jZ_0 \tan(\beta l)} = Z_0 \frac{Z_0(1 + j\tan(\beta l))}{Z_0(1 + j\tan(\beta l))} = Z_0\). The statement says \(Z_{in} = Z_0\). This is TRUE. (d) At a half-wavelength from load (\(l = \lambda/2\)), \(Z_{in} = Z_L\), and repeats for every half wavelength thereafter. If \(l = n\lambda/2\) (where n is an integer), then \(\beta l = (2\pi/\lambda) (n\lambda/2) = n\pi\). \(\tan(\beta l) = \tan(n\pi) = 0\). Then \(Z_{in} = Z_0 \frac{Z_L + jZ_0(0)}{Z_0 + jZ_L(0)} = Z_0 \frac{Z_L}{Z_0} = Z_L\). This is TRUE. The input impedance repeats every half-wavelength. Therefore, the statement that is "not true" is (a). \[ \boxed{Z_{in} = -jZ_0 \text{ for a shorted line with } l = \frac{\lambda}{8}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0