Step 1: Evaluate each statement about spillways.
- Statement A: Sedimentation at the outlet of a chute spillway would create a backwater effect, which would reduce the effective head and thus decrease the capacity. This statement is true.
- Statement B: The capacity of a pipe spillway, like flow in a pipe, is related to the head to the power of 1/2 (\( Q \propto \sqrt{H} \)), not the cube root. This statement is false.
- Statement C: This statement is poorly phrased. "Longitudinal spills" is not a standard term. It may refer to guide walls or vanes within a spillway, which are used to direct and straighten the flow, reducing turbulence. Assuming this interpretation, the statement is true.
- Statement D: Drop inlet spillways are generally used for small dams and erosion control structures where there is a relatively small drop in elevation. A drop of 3 meters (about 10 feet) is a typical upper limit for their effective and economical use. This statement is true.
Step 2: Re-evaluate options based on standard knowledge.
There seems to be ambiguity in the question and potential inaccuracies in the statements. Let's re-examine. Statement A is definitively true. Statement B is definitively false. Statements C and D are generally accepted as true in practice. If we have to choose from the options, we must find a combination of true statements. Since B is false, options A, B, and C are incorrect. This leaves D as the only possibility, implying that A is considered false for some reason, and C and D are considered true. Let's reconsider A. Perhaps sedimentation at the outlet (downstream) doesn't always affect capacity if the flow is supercritical. This is complex. However, C and D are strong, generally true statements in design principles. Let's assume C and D are the intended correct statements.