Step 1: Recall the formula for resolution.
The resolution of an optical microscope is given by Abbe’s equation:
\[
d = \frac{0.61 \lambda}{n \sin \theta}
\]
where
- $d$ = minimum resolvable distance,
- $\lambda$ = wavelength of light,
- $n$ = refractive index of the medium,
- $\theta$ = half-angle of the aperture of the objective lens.
Step 2: Analyze statement (A).
- Increasing the aperture ($\sin \theta$ increases) improves resolution (i.e., reduces $d$).
- Hence, the statement “it deteriorates the resolution” is false.
Step 3: Analyze statement (B).
- Resolution $d \propto \lambda$.
- Reducing $\lambda$ (shorter wavelength light) leads to smaller $d$ $\Rightarrow$ better resolution.
- Hence, (B) is true.
Step 4: Analyze statement (C).
- Increasing $n$ (refractive index) increases numerical aperture $NA = n \sin \theta$.
- Larger $NA$ $\Rightarrow$ smaller $d$ $\Rightarrow$ improved resolution.
- Hence, (C) is true.
Step 5: Analyze statement (D).
- Depth of field is inversely related to resolution.
- Using shorter wavelength light improves resolution but reduces depth of field.
- Hence, (D) is true.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{\text{(B), (C), and (D)}}
\]