In order to understand why Public Opinion is not a source of law in India, it is important to delve deeper into the recognized sources of law in the country. The legal system in India is based on the principles of justice, equity, and good conscience, and law-making is primarily carried out through structured, institutionalized processes. The following are the recognized sources of law in India:
Legislation refers to laws passed by the legislative bodies such as the Parliament of India and State Legislatures. It is the most formal and authoritative source of law in India. The Constitution of India itself is the supreme legislation, and all laws must conform to it. Other significant legislations include Acts of Parliament, ordinances, and rules and regulations framed by the government under the authority granted by these Acts. Examples include:
The Parliament also has the power to amend existing laws or enact new laws, and these changes have a binding effect across the country. Legislation is the most binding form of law in India.
Precedent is another essential source of law in India. It refers to the principle of stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." Precedent includes the decisions made by the higher courts, primarily the Supreme Court of India and High Courts, which lower courts are bound to follow. These judicial decisions create a body of case law that shapes the interpretation of statutes and regulations. For example:
The judgments of the Supreme Court, particularly in matters of constitutional interpretation, have profound implications on the country's legal framework, and lower courts are bound to follow them in similar future cases.
Custom refers to practices or traditions that have been followed by specific communities over a long period of time. These practices may become a source of law when they meet certain criteria, such as being consistent with public policy and not conflicting with statutory law. The legal recognition of customs is particularly prevalent in matters related to personal law. For instance:
However, for a custom to become legally binding, it must satisfy specific conditions. It must be ancient, reasonable, and not in conflict with other laws or public policy.
Public Opinion is the least formal and least authoritative source of law in India. While public opinion can significantly influence the legislative process and judicial interpretation, it does not have the legal standing to be considered a source of law in itself. For example:
While public opinion is an important factor in the democratic process, it is not recognized as a formal source of law in India. The role of public opinion is indirect—it helps shape the direction of law-making and legal reforms, but it does not directly create legal obligations.
Thus, Public Opinion is not a source of law in India. The proper sources of law are Legislation, Precedent, and Custom.
Criminology is the scientific and jurisprudential study of crime, criminal behaviour, and the penal response of the state. It operates at the intersection of law, sociology, psychology, and public policy. Its foundational principle is nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege, stressing that there is no crime nor punishment without a pre-existing law. Traditional criminology was shaped by the Classical School, emphasizing free will and rationality. Influenced by Bentham’s utilitarianism, it viewed punishment as a deterrent mechanism, echoing audi alteram partem in demanding procedural fairness. In contrast, the Positivist School, focused on biological, psychological, and sociological causes of criminality, thereby shifting from retributive justice to rehabilitative models.
Modern criminology encompasses diverse domains like victimology, penology, white-collar crime, cybercrime, and transnational offences. The traditional ele ments of crime, mens rea and actus reus remain crucial. However, strict liability offences and corporate crimes often challenge this binary. With the advent of globalization, criminology now interfaces with international criminal law, human rights jurisprudence, and restorative justice. It aims to reintegrate the offender and provide restitution to victims. Furthermore, critical criminology interrogates how law disproportionately penalizes marginalized groups, reflecting concerns of penal populism, mass incarceration, and criminalization of poverty. This evolving discipline critiques not just criminal behaviour but the social construction of de viance itself.
Under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 a mortgage is a transfer of an interest in specific immovable property for securing the payment of a debt. Section 58 of the Act enumerates six distinct types of mortgages, each characterized by unique rights and obligations of the mortgagor and mortgagee. These categories reflect the balance of right of alienation and right to hold the property, contingent upon the nature of the transfer. In a simple mortgage, the mortgagor binds himself personally to repay the debt and agrees, expressly or impliedly, that in the event of default, the mortgagee shall have the right to cause the mortgaged property to be sold. There is no transfer of possession.
A mortgage by conditional sale involves an ostensible sale with a condition that upon default of payment, the sale becomes absolute. Courts scrutinize such arrangements to prevent clogs on the equity of redemption. A usufructuary mortgage grants the mortgagee possession and the right to receive rents and profits in lieu of interest or principal, aligning with the maxim, nemo dat quod non habet. It is essential to note that an earlier mortgage takes precedence based on the legal maxim, qui prior est tempore potior est jure. An English mortgage entails personal liability of the mortgagor and an absolute transfer of the property to the mortgagee with a covenant to retransfer upon payment. Other forms include mortgage by deposit of title deeds or equitable mortgage, and anomalous mortgages, which do not fit into the above classifications. These variations reveal the nuanced jurisprudence of secured transactions, balancing contractual freedom with equitable oversight.