Question:

Which of the following is irrelevant fact under Evidence Act, 1872?

Show Hint

Under the Evidence Act, 1872, only facts that are relevant and related to the case are admissible in court. Facts without related conduct are generally not admissible.
Updated On: Nov 3, 2025
  • Facts regarding motive;
  • Facts regarding statements without related conduct;
  • Facts regarding statements clubbed with conduct;
  • Facts which make other relevant fact highly probable;
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Relevance of Facts under Evidence Act, 1872:
The Evidence Act of 1872 provides guidelines on the admissibility of facts in court. According to the Act, only facts that are relevant to the case and related to the matter at hand can be admitted as evidence.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation of the Options:
- (A) Facts regarding motive: This is relevant, as the motive behind a crime or action is often an important piece of evidence in understanding the case.
- (B) Facts regarding statements without related conduct: This is the correct answer. Statements without any related conduct or context are generally not considered relevant facts under the Evidence Act.
- (C) Facts regarding statements clubbed with conduct: This is relevant, as statements accompanied by related conduct can be significant in proving a point in court.
- (D) Facts which make other relevant fact highly probable: This is relevant, as facts that make other facts more likely to be true are often admissible in court as they support the overall case.
Step 3: Final Conclusion:
The correct answer is (B) Facts regarding statements without related conduct, as these are generally not admissible under the Evidence Act, 1872.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0