Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks to identify the primary drawback or disadvantage of using remote sensing technology.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the options:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{(A) It saves time and manpower...: This is a major advantage of remote sensing, not a disadvantage. } \\ \bullet & \text{(B) It provides only a synoptic overview...: Providing a synoptic (large-scale) view is also a key advantage, allowing for the study of large areas at once. } \\ \bullet & \text{(C) It cannot provide all the information...: This is a limitation, as remote sensing data often requires "ground-truthing" (field verification). However, this is true for many scientific methods; they are rarely standalone. } \\ \bullet & \text{(D) The collection and interpretation is expensive: This is a significant and often prohibitive disadvantage. The costs include satellite launches, sophisticated sensors, data acquisition, powerful computers for processing, specialized software, and highly trained personnel for interpretation. This high cost is a primary barrier to its application. } \\ \end{array}\]
Comparing the disadvantages, the high cost (D) is the most significant and universal barrier, making it the main disadvantage.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The main disadvantage in the application of remote sensing methods is that the collection and interpretation is expensive.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |