Question

Which of the following is a better data story? Give reasons.

 

Hint:

Tip: Better data stories = clarity, comparison, context, and source transparency.

Answer 1

Looking at the two graphs provided, both show the same data: ranks of Indian states based on two indicators — Least Forest Area Lost and Maximum Growth in Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) from 2001–2022.
However, the second graph is a better data story for several reasons:
1. Clear Legend and Labels — The second graph clearly marks what each line represents. It uses clear symbols for “Least Forest Area Lost” and “Max. GSDP Growth,” which help the reader understand the comparison quickly.
2. Consistent Design — It maintains a neat and consistent design with visible data points and smooth lines, making the trends easier to follow.
3. Direct Comparison — The second graph makes it obvious how economic growth relates to forest conservation by plotting both lines together on the same axis.
This allows the audience to see connections and conflicts between the two aspects, adding depth to the story.
4. Supporting Information — The graph includes the data source in a clear note, which builds trust and credibility.
A good data story does not just show numbers — it explains relationships and drives the audience to think critically.
The second graph meets these points better than the first, making it more effective for storytelling.