Which of the following are not correct as per the Constitution of India?
(A) President of India is not a de jure executive
(B) Prime Minister and Council of Ministers are de facto executive
(C) Council of Ministers are responsible to the Lok Sabha
(D) Council of Ministers is not subject to judicial review.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Show Hint
- (A) and (B) only
- (A) and (D) only
- (B) and (C) only
- (B) and (D) only
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Review each statement.
- (A) False: President is a de jure executive.
- (B) True: Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers are de facto executors of government policy.
- (C) True: The Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha.
- (D) False: Council of Ministers is subject to judicial review.
Top Questions on Indian Constitution
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Indian Constitution
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Indian Constitution
- Arrange the following as per the provisions of the Constitution of India: (A) Free and compulsory Education
(B) Special provisions for women and children
(C) Prohibition of employment of children in factories
(D) Instruction in mother-tongue at primary school Choose the correct answer from the options given below:- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Indian Constitution
- When an emergency under Article 352 of the Constitution is proclaimed, the President of India has no power to suspend the:
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Indian Constitution
- Arrange the following amendments to the Constitution in a chronological order.
A. Incorporation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli as Union Territory
B. Abolition of Election Tribunals
C. Abolition of Privy Purse
D. Reducing the age for voting rights from 21 to 18 years
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Political Science
- Indian Constitution
Questions Asked in CUET PG exam
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Law of Torts
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Contract Law
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Complete Justice} & \text{(I) Article 137} \\ \hline \text{(B) Special Leave Petition} & \text{(II) Article 131} \\ \hline \text{(C) Review of the Judgments} & \text{(III) Article 142} \\ \hline \text{(D) Original Jurisdiction} & \text{(IV) Article 136} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Judicial Process
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Administrative Law
- Which among the following cases are connected to Volunti Non Fit Injuria?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Law of Torts