To solve the problem, we need to identify which among the given statements about reaction kinetics is false.
1. Analyzing Statement (A):
Rate of a zero-order reaction is independent of the initial concentration of reactant. For a zero-order reaction, the rate law is $ \text{Rate} = k $, which does not depend on concentration. This statement is true.
2. Analyzing Statement (B):
Half-life of a zero-order reaction is inversely proportional to the rate constant. The half-life for a zero-order reaction is given by $ t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k} $, where $ [A]_0 $ is the initial concentration. The half-life depends on $ [A]_0 $ and $ k $, but the statement claims it’s inversely proportional to the rate constant $ k $. Since $ t_{1/2} \propto \frac{1}{k} $, this statement is true.
3. Analyzing Statement (C):
Molecularity of a reaction may be zero. Molecularity represents the number of molecules colliding in an elementary reaction step and must be a positive integer (1, 2, or 3). It cannot be zero, as that would imply no molecules are involved, which is not possible for a reaction. This statement is false.
4. Analyzing Statement (D):
For a first-order reaction, $ t_{1/2} = 0.693/k $. For a first-order reaction, the half-life is $ t_{1/2} = \frac{\ln(2)}{k} \approx \frac{0.693}{k} $, which matches the given formula. This statement is true.
Final Answer:
The false statement is (C) Molecularity of a reaction may be zero.
Consider the following compounds. Arrange these compounds in a n increasing order of reactivity with nitrating mixture. The correct order is : 

A ladder of fixed length \( h \) is to be placed along the wall such that it is free to move along the height of the wall.
Based upon the above information, answer the following questions:
(iii) (b) If the foot of the ladder, whose length is 5 m, is being pulled towards the wall such that the rate of decrease of distance \( y \) is \( 2 \, \text{m/s} \), then at what rate is the height on the wall \( x \) increasing when the foot of the ladder is 3 m away from the wall?