The conclusion in the passage suggests that elections in country Y are psychologically traumatizing, potentially leading to depression, as evidenced by increased online searches about depression around election times. To weaken this conclusion, we need to identify an alternative explanation that suggests the elections are not the cause of increased depression levels. Consider the available options:
A survey in country Y shows that an election can cause a significant increase in the average level of depression.
Depression-related advertisements are on the rise during and just after the election in country Y.
Many people do not use the Internet in country X.
Election is a festival in some countries, people happily choose their leader by casting votes.
Per day sale of anti-depression drugs is constant across the years in country Y.
The correct statement that most seriously weakens the conclusion is:
Per day sale of anti-depression drugs is constant across the years in country Y.
This option suggests that despite an increase in online searches about depression, the actual consumption of anti-depression drugs has not changed. This implies that the increased searches may not reflect an actual increase in depression rates. Instead, they could be influenced by other factors such as heightened awareness due to advertising or seasonal trends, rather than the elections being psychologically traumatizing.