Vatting process does not accelerate due to \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\)
Step 1: Define the "vatting" process. Vatting is the chemical reduction of an insoluble vat dye into its water-soluble "leuco" form. This reaction is carried out using a reducing agent (like sodium hydrosulphite) in an alkaline solution (like caustic soda).
Step 2: Analyze the factors that affect the rate of a chemical reaction.
- (A) Temperature: Increasing the temperature generally increases the rate of chemical reactions. The vatting process is often carried out at elevated temperatures (e.g., 50-60°C) to speed it up. So, temperature does accelerate the process.
- (B) Concentration of alkali: The correct pH and concentration of alkali are essential for the reduction to proceed efficiently. Having the right concentration accelerates the process.
- (C) Concentration of reducing agent: The reducing agent is a reactant. Increasing its concentration (up to a certain point) will increase the rate of the reduction reaction according to the law of mass action. So, this does accelerate the process.
- (D) Time: Time is the duration over which the reaction occurs; it is not a factor that changes the rate (speed) of the reaction. A certain amount of time is required for the reaction to complete, but time itself does not accelerate the process. The other factors (temperature, concentration) are what determine how much reaction happens within a given amount of time.
Conclusion: Temperature and concentrations of reactants are catalysts or drivers of the reaction rate. Time is a result, not a cause of acceleration. Therefore, the vatting process is not accelerated *due to* time.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |