\(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\) has the highest Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD).
Step 1: Define Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD). BOD is a measure of the amount of dissolved oxygen needed by aerobic biological organisms to break down organic material present in a given water sample. A high BOD indicates a large amount of biodegradable organic pollution. Sizing agents are a major source of BOD in textile effluent.
Step 2: Analyze the biodegradability of the options.
- (A) Corn starch: A natural polymer made of glucose. It is readily broken down by microorganisms, and this process consumes a large amount of oxygen. Therefore, it has a very high BOD.
- (B) British gum: This is a type of dextrin, which is a modified starch. It is also highly biodegradable and has a high BOD, similar to starch.
- (C) C. M. C. (Carboxymethyl cellulose): A chemically modified cellulose. It is much more resistant to biological degradation than natural starch. It has a significantly lower BOD.
- (D) Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA): A synthetic polymer. While some grades are biodegradable, it is generally much slower to break down than starch and has a lower BOD.
Step 3: Compare the options. Of the choices given, natural, unmodified starch is the most readily and completely biodegradable material, and thus exerts the highest Biological Oxygen Demand.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |