Question:
To improve productivity, manufacturing companies have recently begun restructuring work to produce more goods with fewer assembly-line workers, and the companies have laid off many workers as a consequence. The workers laid off have been those with the least seniority (time on the job), generally the younger workers.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following as a conclusion?
To improve productivity, manufacturing companies have recently begun restructuring work to produce more goods with fewer assembly-line workers, and the companies have laid off many workers as a consequence. The workers laid off have been those with the least seniority (time on the job), generally the younger workers.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following as a conclusion?
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following as a conclusion?
Show Hint
A strong conclusion in this type of question is often a re-statement or combination of the premises, using slightly different words. Avoid conclusions that introduce new ideas or require outside knowledge. The answer should be derivable solely from the text provided.
Updated On: Oct 4, 2025
- The products manufactured by the companies are not undergoing design changes while the manufacturing jobs are being restructured.
- When assembly-line workers have made suggestions for improvements in manufacturing processes, some suggestions have been implemented, but many have not.
- Assembly-line workers now need increased reading and mathematical skills to do their jobs.
- Some of the innovations in assembly-line processes and procedures that were made to increase productivity have instead proved to be counterproductive.
- The manufacturing companies are increasing the average age of their assembly-line workforce while still seeking to increase production.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a critical reasoning question that asks for the most logical conclusion that can be drawn from a set of premises. We must synthesize the given statements to see what necessarily follows.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Break down the premises and combine them:
- Premise 1: Goal is to "improve productivity" and "increase production."
- Premise 2: Companies are laying off workers.
- Premise 3: The laid-off workers are the "younger workers" with the "least seniority."
The conclusion must be a direct consequence of these facts.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the consequences of the premises. If a company is selectively removing its youngest workers, the average age of the remaining workforce must mathematically increase. The passage also explicitly states that the goal of this entire process is to "improve productivity" and "produce more goods."
- (A), (B), and (C) introduce new information about product design, worker suggestions, and skills, none of which is mentioned in the text. They are not supported conclusions.
- (D) This contradicts the stated purpose of the restructuring, which is to increase productivity. While it's possible for innovations to fail, the premises don't support this conclusion.
- (E) This statement directly combines two points from the passage. The goal is "seeking to increase production" (from the first sentence). The consequence of laying off the youngest workers is "increasing the average age of their assembly-line workforce" (from the last sentence). This is a perfect summary and a strongly supported conclusion.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The provided statements lead directly to the conclusion that the companies are simultaneously raising the average age of their workforce (by laying off younger employees) and pursuing a goal of increased production.
This is a critical reasoning question that asks for the most logical conclusion that can be drawn from a set of premises. We must synthesize the given statements to see what necessarily follows.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Break down the premises and combine them:
- Premise 1: Goal is to "improve productivity" and "increase production."
- Premise 2: Companies are laying off workers.
- Premise 3: The laid-off workers are the "younger workers" with the "least seniority."
The conclusion must be a direct consequence of these facts.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the consequences of the premises. If a company is selectively removing its youngest workers, the average age of the remaining workforce must mathematically increase. The passage also explicitly states that the goal of this entire process is to "improve productivity" and "produce more goods."
- (A), (B), and (C) introduce new information about product design, worker suggestions, and skills, none of which is mentioned in the text. They are not supported conclusions.
- (D) This contradicts the stated purpose of the restructuring, which is to increase productivity. While it's possible for innovations to fail, the premises don't support this conclusion.
- (E) This statement directly combines two points from the passage. The goal is "seeking to increase production" (from the first sentence). The consequence of laying off the youngest workers is "increasing the average age of their assembly-line workforce" (from the last sentence). This is a perfect summary and a strongly supported conclusion.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The provided statements lead directly to the conclusion that the companies are simultaneously raising the average age of their workforce (by laying off younger employees) and pursuing a goal of increased production.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Critical Reasoning
- A factory was trying out a new process for producing one of its products, with the goal of reducing production costs. A trial production run using the new process showed a fifteen percent reduction in costs compared with past performance using the standard process. The production managers therefore concluded that the new process did produce a cost savings. Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the production managers' conclusion?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- Although migraine headaches are believed to be caused by food allergies, putting patients on diets that eliminate those foods to which the patients have been demonstrated to have allergic migraine reactions frequently does not stop headaches. Obviously, some other cause of migraine headaches besides food allergies must exist. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- Astronomer: In 2022, Observatory Z discovered 12 comets within a two-month span, an unusually high figure compared to their typical average of 3-4 comet discoveries per year. Strikingly, most of these 12 comets were discovered using a decade-old telescope, while a recently acquired state-of-the-art telescope, capable of scanning larger portions of the sky and detecting fainter objects, identified only one comet in the same period. This discrepancy is puzzling, given that the new telescope was designed to vastly outperform the older model. Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the discrepancy described by the astronomer?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- In 2018, a medium-sized company implemented a remote work policy allowing employees to work from home two days a week. A study before the policy was introduced showed average employee productivity scores. A follow-up study conducted two years later showed that productivity among employees had increased by 25%. The company concluded that remote work boosts employee productivity. Meanwhile, a separate study of two similar companies that had allowed remote work for over a decade showed no significant change in productivity during the same two-year period. The results of the final study mentioned above:
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- Principle: An investment strategy is prudent only if it does not expose the investor to an unacceptable level of financial risk. Application: Noah has recently begun using a strategy that includes investing in early-stage tech startups. Although the strategy diversifies his portfolio, it increases his exposure to assets that are less stable than traditional blue-chip stocks. Therefore, his strategy is not prudent. The application of the principle is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
View More Questions
Questions Asked in GRE exam
For the past two years at FasCorp, there has been a policy to advertise any job opening to current employees and to give no job to an applicant from outside the company if a FasCorp employee applies who is qualified for the job. This policy has been strictly followed, yet even though numerous employees of FasCorp have been qualified for any given entry-level position, some entry-level jobs have been filled with people from outside the company.
If the information provided is true, which of the following must on the basis of it also be true about FasCorp during the past two years?- GRE - 2025
- Reading Comprehension
As an example of the devastation wrought on music publishers by the photocopier, one executive noted that for a recent choral festival with 1,200 singers, the festival’s organizing committee purchased only 12 copies of the music published by her company that was 5 performed as part of the festival.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the support the example lends to the executive’s contention that music publishers have been devastated by the photocopier?- GRE - 2025
- Reading Comprehension
Early critics of Emily Dickinson’s poetry mistook for simplemindedness the surface of artlessness that in fact she constructed with ...............
- GRE - 2025
- Sentence Completion
The macromolecule RNA is common to all living beings, and DNA, which is found in all organisms except some bacteria, is almost as ...............
- GRE - 2025
- Sentence Completion
Linguistic science confirms what experienced users of ASL—American Sign Language—have always implicitly known: ASL is a grammatically .............. language, as capable of expressing a full range of syntactic relations as any natural spoken language.
- GRE - 2025
- Sentence Completion
View More Questions