Step 1: Identify the author’s main claim.
The author argues that the political fate of one leader (Prime Minister) may change — she may win or lose, continue or not continue — but the nation itself will survive irrespective of the political uncertainty.
Step 2: Evaluate each option.
- (A) Talks about economic growth affecting the PM, not about the survival of the country despite politics.
- (B) Refers to a young working population, which is positive but does not directly reinforce the point about political uncertainty being survivable.
- (C) Suggests that survival depends on a particular kind of Prime Minister, which actually contradicts the author’s claim (author says survival is independent of PM).
- (D) States that similar political uncertainty existed in the past, yet the country survived — this directly reinforces the author’s point that the nation is resilient to political shifts.
- (E) Focuses on the PM’s survival, not the country’s survival, which misses the author’s central view.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The option that best supports the author’s argument about resilience of the nation through political uncertainty is (D).
\[
\boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (D) The previous season had also witnessed similar political uncertainty.}}
\]