Question:

There are indications of presence of a massive tabular multimetal sulfide ore body at a shallow depth from the surface. Which of the following would be the most efficient geophysical method to confirm the presence of the ore body?

Show Hint

The ground gravity survey is particularly effective for detecting dense ore bodies such as massive sulfides, which contrast well with their surroundings.
Updated On: Dec 26, 2025
  • Resistivity sounding
  • Ground geomagnetic survey
  • Self-potential method of geophysical prospecting
  • Ground gravity survey
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

To detect a massive tabular multimetal sulfide ore body at shallow depth, it is important to use a geophysical method that can effectively distinguish between the ore body and the surrounding rock. The best method for detecting sulfide ore bodies is the ground gravity survey.
- Option (A): Resistivity sounding measures the resistivity of the ground but is less effective for sulfide ores, as they may not always show significant resistivity contrasts compared to surrounding rocks.
- Option (B): Ground geomagnetic survey detects magnetic anomalies, but sulfide ore bodies do not always produce strong magnetic anomalies unless they are particularly magnetite-rich.
- Option (C): Self-potential method of geophysical prospecting measures natural electric potentials but is not as widely effective for detecting massive sulfide ore bodies compared to other methods.
- Option (D): Ground gravity survey measures density contrasts in the subsurface. Sulfide ore bodies are typically denser than surrounding rock, making gravity surveys a very effective tool for detecting them.
Step 2: Conclusion.
The best method for detecting a sulfide ore body at shallow depth is a ground gravity survey, which provides the most direct information based on density differences.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0