Question:
There are few things worse for a new parent than listening to a baby scream in hunger while a bottle of formula slowly warms up in a bowl of hot water. So why not just pop the bottle in the microwave and zap it in 20 seconds? Because microwaves heat fluids unevenly, and a hot pocket in the formula could seriously injure the baby.
Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against heating formula in the microwave?
There are few things worse for a new parent than listening to a baby scream in hunger while a bottle of formula slowly warms up in a bowl of hot water. So why not just pop the bottle in the microwave and zap it in 20 seconds? Because microwaves heat fluids unevenly, and a hot pocket in the formula could seriously injure the baby.
Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against heating formula in the microwave?
Show Hint
When analyzing an argument, focus on the assumptions that underlie the reasoning and the concerns about the procedure or suggestion.
Updated On: Oct 3, 2025
- Babies generally refuse to eat formula that has been heated in a microwave.
- Microwave radiation might break down some of the proteins in formula that are vital to a baby’s health.
- Different microwaves use different amounts of power, and consequently some models could heat a bottle to scalding temperature faster than others.
- Parents cannot be expected to consistently even out the temperature of a microwaved bottle by shaking it vigorously before giving it to the baby.
- Once formula has been heated, any leftover formula should be discarded, because otherwise the formula could spoil between feedings and make the baby sick.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understand the argument.
The argument warns against microwaving baby formula because of uneven heating and the possibility of creating hot pockets. To support this, the argument assumes that parents cannot ensure the even distribution of heat.
Step 2: Review the answer choices.
- (A) The passage does not discuss babies refusing microwaved formula, so this is not assumed.
- (B) The passage does not mention any concerns about nutritional value, so this is not the presupposition.
- (C) The passage mentions uneven heating, but it is not about different microwaves’ power levels, so this is not the presupposition.
- (D) This option directly reflects the assumption that parents cannot reliably even out the heating of the formula.
- (E) The passage does not discuss leftover formula, so this is not a presupposition.
Conclusion:
Option (D) is the best answer as it supports the argument that uneven heating could be dangerous if parents cannot ensure even heat distribution.
The argument warns against microwaving baby formula because of uneven heating and the possibility of creating hot pockets. To support this, the argument assumes that parents cannot ensure the even distribution of heat.
Step 2: Review the answer choices.
- (A) The passage does not discuss babies refusing microwaved formula, so this is not assumed.
- (B) The passage does not mention any concerns about nutritional value, so this is not the presupposition.
- (C) The passage mentions uneven heating, but it is not about different microwaves’ power levels, so this is not the presupposition.
- (D) This option directly reflects the assumption that parents cannot reliably even out the heating of the formula.
- (E) The passage does not discuss leftover formula, so this is not a presupposition.
Conclusion:
Option (D) is the best answer as it supports the argument that uneven heating could be dangerous if parents cannot ensure even heat distribution.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Critical Reasoning
- A factory was trying out a new process for producing one of its products, with the goal of reducing production costs. A trial production run using the new process showed a fifteen percent reduction in costs compared with past performance using the standard process. The production managers therefore concluded that the new process did produce a cost savings. Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the production managers' conclusion?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- Although migraine headaches are believed to be caused by food allergies, putting patients on diets that eliminate those foods to which the patients have been demonstrated to have allergic migraine reactions frequently does not stop headaches. Obviously, some other cause of migraine headaches besides food allergies must exist. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- Astronomer: In 2022, Observatory Z discovered 12 comets within a two-month span, an unusually high figure compared to their typical average of 3-4 comet discoveries per year. Strikingly, most of these 12 comets were discovered using a decade-old telescope, while a recently acquired state-of-the-art telescope, capable of scanning larger portions of the sky and detecting fainter objects, identified only one comet in the same period. This discrepancy is puzzling, given that the new telescope was designed to vastly outperform the older model. Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the discrepancy described by the astronomer?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- In 2018, a medium-sized company implemented a remote work policy allowing employees to work from home two days a week. A study before the policy was introduced showed average employee productivity scores. A follow-up study conducted two years later showed that productivity among employees had increased by 25%. The company concluded that remote work boosts employee productivity. Meanwhile, a separate study of two similar companies that had allowed remote work for over a decade showed no significant change in productivity during the same two-year period. The results of the final study mentioned above:
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
- Principle: An investment strategy is prudent only if it does not expose the investor to an unacceptable level of financial risk. Application: Noah has recently begun using a strategy that includes investing in early-stage tech startups. Although the strategy diversifies his portfolio, it increases his exposure to assets that are less stable than traditional blue-chip stocks. Therefore, his strategy is not prudent. The application of the principle is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Critical Reasoning
View More Questions
Questions Asked in GMAT exam
- If y = 3, then y³(y³-y) =
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
- Solve the following equation for A: 2A/3 = 8 + 4A
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
- Over the past 7 weeks, the Smith family had weekly grocery bills of $74, $69, $64, $79, $64, $84, and $77. What was the Smiths' average (arithmetic mean) weekly grocery bill over the 7-week period?
- GMAT - 2025
- Averages
View More Questions