Step 1: Understand the concept being described. This is known as the "weakest link theory" as it applies to textiles. A yarn is like a chain; its overall strength is determined by the strength of its weakest link.
Step 2: Analyze the effect of specimen length. A yarn is never perfectly uniform; it has natural variations in thickness and strength along its length. It contains thin, weak places as well as thick, strong places. - A short specimen of yarn has a certain probability of containing a weak spot. - A longer specimen of yarn has a statistically higher probability of containing an even weaker spot somewhere along its greater length.
Step 3: Apply the weakest link theory. When the yarn is tested for strength, it will always break at its weakest point. Since a longer specimen is more likely to contain a very weak point than a shorter specimen, the average breaking strength measured for longer specimens will be lower than that for shorter specimens.
Conclusion: The strength of yarn decreases with increasing specimen length because there is a higher probability of finding exceptionally weak places in a longer length.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |