Step 1: Understanding Standard Reduction Potentials
\(E^\circ_{\text{red}} (H^+/H_2) = 0.00V, E^\circ_{\text{red}} (Cu^{2+}/Cu) = 0.34V, E^\circ_{\text{red}} (Zn^{2+}/Zn) = -0.76V,\)
\(E^\circ_{\text{red}} (NO_3^-/HNO_3) = 0.97V\)
Step 2: Evaluating Statements - Statement I:
- \( H^+ \) can only oxidize a metal if its reduction potential is higher than 0.00V.
- \( Cu \) has \( 0.34V \), which is higher than \(H^+\).
- \( H^+ \) cannot oxidize \( Cu \) to \( Cu^{2+} \) . - Statement II:
- \( Zn \) has a lower reduction potential (-0.76V) than \( Cu^{2+}/Cu (0.34V) \).
- \( Zn \) is a stronger reducing agent, so it can reduce \( Cu^{2+} \) to \( Cu \).
- This statement is correct. - Statement III:
- \( NO_3^- \) has a higher reduction potential (0.97V) than \( Cu^{2+}/Cu (0.34V) \).
- \( NO_3^- \) can oxidize \( Cu \) to \( Cu^{2+} \).
- This statement is correct.
Concentration of KCl solution (mol/L) | Conductivity at 298.15 K (S cm-1) | Molar Conductivity at 298.15 K (S cm2 mol-1) |
---|---|---|
1.000 | 0.1113 | 111.3 |
0.100 | 0.0129 | 129.0 |
0.010 | 0.00141 | 141.0 |
Match the pollination types in List-I with their correct mechanisms in List-II:
List-I (Pollination Type) | List-II (Mechanism) |
---|---|
A) Xenogamy | I) Genetically different type of pollen grains |
B) Ophiophily | II) Pollination by snakes |
C) Chasmogamous | III) Exposed anthers and stigmas |
D) Cleistogamous | IV) Flowers do not open |