| List-I (Reasons) | List-II (Examples) |
|---|---|
| (A) Contract contingent on marriage | (I) A and B contract to marry each other. Before the marriage, A goes mad. |
| (B) Repudiation of a voidable contract | (II) A agrees to sell B 100 bags of wheat. Before delivery, the government bans private trading. |
| (C) Supervening impossibility | (III) A contracts to give a loan if B marries C. C dies unmarried. |
| (D) Subsequent illegality | (IV) A forces B to sell his car worth 15,00,000 for 5,00,000. B rescinds the contract. |
The correct matches are:
- (A) - (I): A contract contingent on marriage becomes void if one party becomes mentally unstable.
- (B) - (II): Repudiation occurs when government action makes private trading illegal.
- (C) - (III): Supervening impossibility happens when a contract cannot be fulfilled due to unforeseen circumstances, like death.
- (D) - (IV): Subsequent illegality applies when consent is not free and leads to rescission of the contract.
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match Fibre with Application.\[\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{LIST I} & \textbf{LIST II} \\ \textbf{Fibre} & \textbf{Application} \\ \hline \hline \text{A. Silk fibre} & \text{I. Fire retardant} \\ \hline \text{B. Wool fibre} & \text{II. Directional lustre} \\ \hline \text{C. Nomex fibre} & \text{III. Bulletproof} \\ \hline \text{D. Kevlar fibre} & \text{IV. Thermal insulation} \\ \hline \end{array}\]